GUSH ranks 2nd and UCO 2nd of 6 funds in the 2x/3x Long Energy Category.
GUSH vs UCO
GUSH −0.01pt a year
0.94%0.95%
UCO 3.9×the volume
685K2.69M
UCO +27.7pt
−33.4%−5.7%
GUSH vs UCO Performance
+105.0%+178.5%
- GUSH 0.94%, better
- UCO 0.95%
- GUSH $226M
- UCO $510M
- GUSH +134.2%
- UCO +213.0%, better
- GUSH 0.93%
- UCO
- GUSH 60
- UCO 1
- GUSH 685K sh
- UCO 2.69M sh, better
- GUSH $49.58
- UCO $68.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GUSH | UCO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61Higher | D32 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D37 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | C43 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C48 | A70Higher |
Rank among 2x/3x Long Energy funds
Same Category. GUSH and UCO are both graded against the same 6 2x/3x Long Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GUSHC
UCOC
In short
GUSH A 2x bet on the drillers, not the barrel. GUSH aims for 200% of the daily move of an S&P index of oil and gas exploration and production stocks, resetting every single close.
UCO Most leveraged energy funds juice oil-company stocks. UCO levers the barrel itself: 2x the daily move of a WTI futures index that spreads across three roll schedules instead of camping in the front-month contract.
Stated mandate
GUSH The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index, before fees and expenses.
UCO UCO seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GUSH vs UCO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GUSH vs UCO Cost
Overpaying UCO vs GUSH
$165
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GUSH 0.94%
$17,704
UCO 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GUSH | UCO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,661 | $1,678 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,260 | $6,322 | $62 |
| 30 | $17,704 | $17,869 | $165 |
- 0.94%GUSH, cheaper
- 0.95%UCO
- Middle half of 2x/3x Long Energy funds
- Median 0.94%
GUSH 3rd cheapest of 6 funds
UCO 4th cheapest of 6 funds
GUSH vs UCO Dividends
- GUSH 0.93%
- UCO
- GUSH $0.48
- UCO None
- GUSH $0.15
- UCO
- GUSH Sep 22, 2026
- UCO
- GUSH Sep 29, 2026
- UCO
- GUSH Quarterly
- UCO
Distribution history
GUSH vs UCO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GUSH
- UCO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GUSH 53.7%UCO 53.7%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- GUSH 0.41UCO 0.63, better
- Worst fall
- GUSH −73.7%UCO −67.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GUSH 0.01UCO 2.79
GUSH and UCO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.94% · 0.91%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.91%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

