ERX ranks 1st and UCO 2nd of 6 funds in the 2x/3x Long Energy Category.
ERX vs UCO
ERX −0.04pt a year
0.91%0.95%
UCO 9.4×the volume
287K2.69M
UCO +0.6pt
−6.3%−5.7%
ERX vs UCO Performance
+363.0%+178.5%
- ERX 0.91%, better
- UCO 0.95%
- ERX $287M
- UCO $510M
- ERX +140.9%
- UCO +213.0%, better
- ERX 1.08%
- UCO
- ERX 28
- UCO 1
- ERX 287K sh
- UCO 2.69M sh, better
- ERX $124.23
- UCO $68.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ERX | UCO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74Higher | D32 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | C54 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C53 | A70Higher |
Rank among 2x/3x Long Energy funds
Same Category. ERX and UCO are both graded against the same 6 2x/3x Long Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ERXB
UCOC
In short
ERX The 2008 original of the leveraged energy trade: 2x the daily move of the Energy Select Sector Index, built from oil-major stocks rather than crude futures. Sector-wide exposure, dialed up, for holding periods measured in days.
UCO Most leveraged energy funds juice oil-company stocks. UCO levers the barrel itself: 2x the daily move of a WTI futures index that spreads across three roll schedules instead of camping in the front-month contract.
Stated mandate
ERX The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of the Energy Select Sector Index for a single day. It is not designed to deliver twice the index’s cumulative return over periods longer than one day.
UCO UCO seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ERX vs UCO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ERX vs UCO Cost
Overpaying UCO vs ERX
$662
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ERX 0.91%
$17,207
UCO 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ERX | UCO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,610 | $1,678 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,076 | $6,322 | $246 |
| 30 | $17,207 | $17,869 | $662 |
- 0.91%ERX, cheaper
- 0.95%UCO
- Middle half of 2x/3x Long Energy funds
- Median 0.94%
ERX 2nd cheapest of 6 funds
UCO 4th cheapest of 6 funds
ERX vs UCO Dividends
- ERX 1.08%
- UCO
- ERX $1.39
- UCO None
- ERX $0.37
- UCO
- ERX Sep 22, 2026
- UCO
- ERX Sep 29, 2026
- UCO
- ERX Quarterly
- UCO
Distribution history
ERX vs UCO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ERX
- UCO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ERX 43.5%, betterUCO 53.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ERX 0.77, betterUCO 0.63
- Worst fall
- ERX −46.9%, betterUCO −67.2%
- Market sensitivity
- ERX −0.03UCO 2.79
ERX and UCO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.91% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.91% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.91% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

