QLV ranks 2nd and SMLV 4th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
QLV vs SMLV
QLV −0.04pt a year
0.08%0.12%
QLV 2.5×the volume
8.83K3.51K
QLV +1.5pt
+10.3%+8.8%
QLV vs SMLV Performance
+63.3%+52.2%
- QLV 0.08%, better
- SMLV 0.12%
- QLV $189M
- SMLV $260M
- QLV +17.0%
- SMLV +25.8%, better
- QLV 1.43%
- SMLV 2.34%, better
- QLV 122
- SMLV 393
- QLV 8.83K sh, better
- SMLV 3.51K sh
- QLV $82.16
- SMLV $156.67
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLV | SMLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A90 |
| Mission | A76Higher | B69 |
| Risk | A86Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | B67Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | D34 | A79Higher |
| Durability | D31 | C53Higher |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. QLV and SMLV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLVA
SMLVB
In short
QLV Low vol with a quality gate: the index cuts the weakest-scoring fifth of US large and mid caps, then optimizes what's left for calm. Fee is 0.08% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
SMLV Low volatility is usually a large-cap game. SMLV runs the same calm-stocks screen down where the swings actually live: US small caps, roughly 400 of them, for 0.12% a year.
Stated mandate
QLV The fund seeks to track the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index and provide exposure to U.S. companies selected for lower overall volatility and quality characteristics.
SMLV The fund's advertised mandate is exposure to U.S. small-capitalization companies selected for low volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLV vs SMLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLV vs SMLV Cost
Overpaying SMLV vs QLV
$831
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLV 0.08%
$1,689
SMLV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLV | SMLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $220 | $73 |
| 20 | $575 | $859 | $284 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $2,520 | $831 |
- 0.08%QLV, cheaper
- 0.12%SMLV
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
QLV cheapest of 16 funds
SMLV 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
QLV vs SMLV Dividends
- QLV 1.43%
- SMLV 2.34%, better
- QLV $1.18
- SMLV $3.63
- QLV $0.28
- SMLV $0.97
- QLV Sep 18, 2026
- SMLV Sep 21, 2026
- QLV Sep 24, 2026
- SMLV Sep 23, 2026
- QLV Quarterly
- SMLV Quarterly
Distribution history
QLV vs SMLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLV
- SMLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLV 8.6%, betterSMLV 17.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLV 1.56, betterSMLV 0.94
- Worst fall
- QLV −17.9%, betterSMLV −20.4%
- Market sensitivity
- QLV 0.58SMLV 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.