SCYB ranks 1st and EUHY 36th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
EUHY vs SCYB
SCYB −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
SCYB 51.8×the volume
21.3K1.1M
EUHY +0.9pt
+9.3%+8.4%
EUHY vs SCYB Performance
+1.2%+2.0%
- EUHY 0.35%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- EUHY $247M
- SCYB $2.8B
- EUHY +1.2%
- SCYB +2.0%, better
- EUHY 7.26%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- EUHY 667
- SCYB 1844
- EUHY 21.3K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- EUHY $51.54
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EUHY | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A73 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D32 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C43 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | A81 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A80Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. EUHY and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EUHYB
SCYBA
In short
EUHY US junk-bond ETFs are everywhere. EUHY goes the other direction: euro-denominated European high yield, with the euro exposure hedged back to dollars. European credit risk, without the currency ride.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
EUHY The fund seeks to track USD-hedged, euro-denominated high-yield bonds, providing euro high-yield exposure while reducing euro-to-dollar currency fluctuations.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EUHY vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EUHY vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying EUHY vs SCYB
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EUHY 0.35%
$7,126
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EUHY | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%EUHY
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
EUHY 24th cheapest of 84 funds
EUHY vs SCYB Dividends
- EUHY 7.26%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- EUHY $3.76
- SCYB $1.80
- EUHY $0.23
- SCYB $0.16
- EUHY Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- EUHY Oct 6, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- EUHY Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
EUHY vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EUHY 7.7%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EUHY 0.62SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- EUHY −29.3%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- EUHY 0.49SCYB 0.28
EUHY and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
