EWC ranks 1st and FLKR 15th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWC vs FLKR
FLKR −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
EWC 2.0×the volume
1.68M830K
FLKR +4.7pt
+11.4%+16.1%
EWC vs FLKR Performance
+71.2%+110.9%
- EWC 0.50%
- FLKR 0.09%, better
- EWC $7.58B
- FLKR $1.79B
- EWC +21.1%
- FLKR +62.5%, better
- EWC 1.24%
- FLKR 2.92%, better
- EWC 83
- FLKR 148
- EWC 1.68M sh, better
- FLKR 830K sh
- EWC $60.62
- FLKR $51.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWC | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A90Higher | B57 |
| Risk | A87Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | A97Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | C50 |
| Durability | A80Higher | B60 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWC and FLKR are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWCA
FLKRB
In short
EWC A 1996 original: Canada's large and mid caps in one ticker, back when single-country funds were still a novelty. About 80 names, held through a capped MSCI index built so one giant can't swamp the basket.
FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.
Stated mandate
EWC The fund seeks to track an index representing Canadian equities, providing exposure to large- and mid-sized companies in Canada.
FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWC vs FLKR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWC vs FLKR Cost
Overpaying EWC vs FLKR
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWC 0.50%
$9,979
FLKR 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWC | FLKR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWC
- 0.09%FLKR, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLKR cheapest of 38 funds
EWC 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWC vs FLKR Dividends
- EWC 1.24%
- FLKR 2.92%, better
- EWC $0.75
- FLKR $1.47
- EWC $0.28
- FLKR $0.30
- EWC Jun 15, 2026
- FLKR Jun 26, 2026
- EWC Jun 18, 2026
- FLKR Jul 6, 2026
- EWC Twice a year
- FLKR Twice a year
Distribution history
EWC vs FLKR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWC
- FLKR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWC 13.1%, betterFLKR 43.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWC 1.54, betterFLKR 0.97
- Worst fall
- EWC −24.8%, betterFLKR −41.3%
- Market sensitivity
- EWC 0.88FLKR 2.57
EWC and FLKR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





