Skip to content

EWG vs FLKR

iShares MSCI Germany ETF

EWGBNYSE Arca

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF

FLKRBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

FLKR −0.40pt a year

EWG0.49%FLKR0.09%

Avg volume · 30D

EWG 1.1×the volume

EWG939KFLKR830K

5Y return · a year

FLKR +8.7pt

EWG+6.9%FLKR+15.6%

EWG vs FLKR Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+39.4%EWG+106.4%FLKR

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. EWG +39.4%. FLKR +106.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%0%150%200%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
EWG 0.49%
FLKR 0.09%, better
Fund size
EWG $1.57B
FLKR $1.79B
1Y total return
EWG +5.6%
FLKR +61.1%, better
Yield (12M)
EWG 1.97%
FLKR 2.94%, better
Holdings
EWG 54
FLKR 148
Avg volume (30D)
EWG 939K sh, better
FLKR 830K sh
NAV per share
EWG $41.88
FLKR $51.47
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EWG: Cost 55, Risk 49, Mission 88, Tradability 84, Holdings 53, Durability 75. FLKR: Cost 93, Risk 25, Mission 57, Tradability 49, Holdings 49, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for EWG, FLKR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEWGFLKR
Cost30% weightB55A93Higher
Mission25% weightA88HigherB57
Risk15% weightC49HigherD25
Tradability15% weightA84HigherC49
Holdings10% weightC53HigherC49
Durability5% weightA75HigherB60

Rank among Developed Single Country funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EWG and FLKR are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Developed Single Country⁠

Category · 38 funds
See all 38 ›

EWG ranks 7th and FLKR 15th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.

  1. Rank 6BEWUiShares MSCI United Kingdom ETFScore 68
  2. Rank 7BEWGiShares MSCI Germany ETFScore 67
  3. Rank 8BEWAiShares MSCI Australia ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 13BFLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETFScore 62
  5. Rank 15BFLKRFranklin FTSE South Korea ETFScore 61
  6. Rank 16BEWQiShares MSCI France ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EWGBiShares MSCI Germany ETF

FLKRBFranklin FTSE South Korea ETF

In short

EWG Germany in one ticker, and it has been doing that job since 1996. Roughly 50 large German companies, tracked closely, at a fee a hair under the typical single-country fund.

FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.

Stated mandate

EWG The fund seeks to track an index of German equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Germany.

FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.

Why people hold it

  • EWG Trading since 1996, it is one of the original single-country ETFs, and it stays actively traded with billions in assets behind it.
  • Sticks closely to its benchmark, the MSCI Germany Index, so the index is a fair read on what the fund is doing.
  • The 0.49% fee lands just under the typical developed single-country fund, and it buys the German blue-chip market in one trade.
  • Rated among the stronger implementations in its developed single-country peer group.
  • FLKR Charges 0.09% a year against a 0.50% median for single-country developed-market ETFs, tying FLAU as the cheapest fee among this cohort's leaders and undercutting EWC and EWU by a wide margin.
  • Straight indexing: it seeks returns that closely correspond, before fees, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index. No manager views, no discretionary tilts.
  • The capped index spreads roughly 160 stocks and limits how far any single giant can dominate the basket, which matters in a market this top-heavy.
  • A billion-dollar-plus fund that trades actively, and it has been running since 2017, so it is well past the launch-window stage.

Worth knowing

  • EWG About 50 stocks in one economy: a handful of German industrial and financial giants carry much of the weight.
  • Cheaper entries into single-country developed markets exist (Franklin's FLAU charges 0.09%), though they track different countries.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly.
  • FLKR One country, one currency. Korean shares price in won, so the exchange rate is baked into what a US investor sees, separate from how the companies do.
  • Roughly 160 stocks in a single export-driven market is a narrow slice next to a global fund. Capping softens concentration, it does not erase it.
  • Distributions land annually or semiannually, not monthly, so it is built as an equity holding rather than an income schedule.

Full EWG profile⁠

Full FLKR profile⁠

EWG vs FLKR Holdings

How EWG and FLKR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of EWG and 0.0% of FLKR.

Level by level

  • Countryby domicile0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors62.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in EWG and FLKR, widest gap first
SectorMore in EWGMore in FLKR
TechnologyFLKR +36.2 points
FinancialsEWG +11.6 points
IndustrialsEWG +10.6 points
UtilitiesEWG +4.3 points
Health CareEWG +4.2 points
MaterialsEWG +2.6 points
CommunicationEWG +2.4 points
Consumer DiscretionaryEWG +1.4 points
EnergyFLKR +1.1 points
Real EstateEWG +0.6 points
Consumer StaplesFLKR +0.5 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EWG and FLKR, widest gap first
CountryMore in EWGMore in FLKR
South KoreaFLKR +100.0 points
GermanyEWG +99.5 points
United StatesEWG +0.6 points

Outside the US: EWG 100% developed, 0% emerging. FLKR 0% developed, 100% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EWG63.0%
  • FLKR57.9%

Securities held

  • EWG50
  • FLKR145

Asset class

EWG
Equity
FLKR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in EWG50
  • In both0
  • Only in FLKR145

Only in EWG

50 securities, 99.9% of EWG by weight

  • Sap12.69%
  • Siemens N AG11.39%
  • Allianz9.89%

Only in FLKR

145 securities, 100% of FLKR by weight

  • Sk Hynix Inc18.91%
  • Samsung Electronics Co Lt18.55%
  • Sk Square Co Ltd4.26%

Weight gaps

EWG and FLKR share no securities.

All 50 EWG holdings⁠All 164 FLKR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EWG vs FLKR Cost

Overpaying EWG vs FLKR

$7,894

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EWG 0.49%

    $9,792

  • FLKR 0.09%

    $1,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EWG 0.49%
  • FLKR 0.09%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530EWG $9,792FLKR $1,898

Year by year

YearEWGFLKROverpaying
10$883$165$718
20$3,394$646$2,748
30$9,792$1,898$7,894

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%EWG
  • 0.09%FLKR, cheaper
  • Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
  • Median 0.50%

FLKR cheapest of 38 funds

EWG 10th cheapest of 38 funds

EWG vs FLKR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
EWG 1.97%
FLKR 2.94%, better
Payout (12M)
EWG $0.83
FLKR $1.47
Last payment
EWG $0.83
FLKR $0.30
Ex-dividend
EWG Jun 15, 2026
FLKR Jun 26, 2026
Paid on
EWG Jun 18, 2026
FLKR Jul 6, 2026
Frequency
EWG Annual
FLKR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

EWGAnnual · 15 paymentsAll EWG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.60; Dec 19, 2017 $0.08; Jun 19, 2018 $0.74; Jun 17, 2019 $0.74; Jun 15, 2020 $0.28; Dec 14, 2020 $0.39; Dec 13, 2021 $0.04; Dec 30, 2021 $0.25; Jun 9, 2022 $0.79; Dec 13, 2022 $0.009; Jun 7, 2023 $0.76; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0015; Jun 11, 2024 $0.76; Jun 16, 2025 $0.68; Jun 15, 2026 $0.83. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
FLKRTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll FLKR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2017 $0.25; Jun 20, 2018 $0.00049; Dec 20, 2018 $0.38; Jun 11, 2019 $0.05; Dec 11, 2019 $0.40; Dec 14, 2020 $0.30; Jun 10, 2021 $0.18; Dec 13, 2021 $0.40; Jun 17, 2022 $0.07; Dec 16, 2022 $0.40; Dec 29, 2022 $0.14; Jun 16, 2023 $0.17; Dec 15, 2023 $0.35; Jun 21, 2024 $1.18; Dec 20, 2024 $0.06; Jun 20, 2025 $0.07; Dec 19, 2025 $1.17; Jun 26, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

EWG vs FLKR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • EWG
  • FLKR
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: FLKR −41.3% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EWG 15.6%, betterFLKR 43.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EWG 1.02, betterFLKR 0.97
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EWG −41.4%FLKR −41.3%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EWG 0.96FLKR 2.57

EWG and FLKR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • EWGBvsEWCA

    iShares MSCI Germany ETF · iShares MSCI Canada ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLKRBvsEWCA

    Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF · iShares MSCI Canada ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EWGBvsFLCAA

    iShares MSCI Germany ETF · Franklin FTSE Canada ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLKRBvsFLCAA

    Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF · Franklin FTSE Canada ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EWGBvsFLGBA

    iShares MSCI Germany ETF · Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLKRBvsFLGBA

    Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF · Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.