EWM ranks 3rd and FLSA 14th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EWM vs FLSA
FLSA −0.11pt a year
0.50%0.39%
EWM 377.5×the volume
214K567
EWM +6.1pt
+4.8%−1.3%
EWM vs FLSA Performance
+26.3%−6.2%
- EWM 0.50%
- FLSA 0.39%, better
- EWM $230M
- FLSA $4M
- EWM +8.2%, better
- FLSA −11.3%
- EWM 3.70%, better
- FLSA 3.33%
- EWM 25
- FLSA 67
- EWM 214K sh, better
- FLSA 567 sh
- EWM $26.87
- FLSA $29.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWM | FLSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88 | A95Higher |
| Mission | C43Higher | F22 |
| Risk | A78Higher | B58 |
| Tradability | B55Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | C41 | B60Higher |
| Durability | B56Higher | D25 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EWM and FLSA are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWMB
FLSAC
In short
EWM Malaysia in one ticker, running since 1996. EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia index, a cap-weighted slice of Kuala Lumpur's largest listed companies, and charges less than the typical single-country emerging markets fund.
FLSA Saudi Arabia in one ticker: roughly 70 Saudi-listed large and mid caps, tracked passively for 0.39% a year, well under the typical single-country emerging-market fund.
Stated mandate
EWM The fund seeks to track an index composed of Malaysian equities.
FLSA The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Saudi Arabia Capped Index through a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWM vs FLSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWM vs FLSA Cost
Overpaying EWM vs FLSA
$2,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWM 0.50%
$9,979
FLSA 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWM | FLSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $705 | $195 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,725 | $735 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $7,898 | $2,081 |
- 0.50%EWM
- 0.39%FLSA, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
FLSA 2nd cheapest of 21 funds
EWM 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
EWM vs FLSA Dividends
- EWM 3.70%, better
- FLSA 3.33%
- EWM $1.00
- FLSA $1.00
- EWM $0.57
- FLSA $0.59
- EWM Jun 15, 2026
- FLSA Jun 26, 2026
- EWM Jun 18, 2026
- FLSA Jul 6, 2026
- EWM Twice a year
- FLSA Twice a year
Distribution history
EWM vs FLSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWM
- FLSA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWM 13.0%, betterFLSA 15.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWM 0.68, betterFLSA −0.23
- Worst fall
- EWM −22.2%, betterFLSA −27.3%
- Market sensitivity
- EWM 0.46FLSA 0.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.