FLMX ranks 2nd and EWM 4th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EWM vs FLMX
FLMX −0.31pt a year
0.50%0.19%
EWM 21.0×the volume
214K10.2K
FLMX +8.1pt
+4.4%+12.5%
EWM vs FLMX Performance
+23.7%+80.3%
- EWM 0.50%
- FLMX 0.19%, better
- EWM $230M
- FLMX $82M
- EWM +7.8%
- FLMX +16.3%, better
- EWM 3.71%
- FLMX 3.91%, better
- EWM 25
- FLMX 39
- EWM 214K sh, better
- FLMX 10.2K sh
- EWM $26.87
- FLMX $36.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWM | FLMX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88 | A100Higher |
| Mission | C43 | B65Higher |
| Risk | A78Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | B55Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | C41 | B64Higher |
| Durability | B56Higher | D37 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EWM and FLMX are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWMB
FLMXB
In short
EWM Malaysia in one ticker, running since 1996. EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia index, a cap-weighted slice of Kuala Lumpur's largest listed companies, and charges less than the typical single-country emerging markets fund.
FLMX Mexico exposure at a discount. Franklin's tracker charges 0.19%, a fraction of what single-country emerging-market funds usually cost, and holds a compact basket of the country's largest listed companies.
Stated mandate
EWM The fund seeks to track an index composed of Malaysian equities.
FLMX The Fund seeks to track the performance of the FTSE Mexico Capped Index before fees and expenses through an indexing strategy, investing at least 80% of assets in index components or related exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWM vs FLMX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWM vs FLMX Cost
Overpaying EWM vs FLMX
$6,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWM 0.50%
$9,979
FLMX 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWM | FLMX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $347 | $553 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $1,351 | $2,109 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $3,952 | $6,027 |
- 0.50%EWM
- 0.19%FLMX, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
FLMX cheapest of 21 funds
EWM 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
EWM vs FLMX Dividends
- EWM 3.71%
- FLMX 3.91%, better
- EWM $1.00
- FLMX $1.42
- EWM $0.57
- FLMX $0.72
- EWM Jun 15, 2026
- FLMX Jun 26, 2026
- EWM Jun 18, 2026
- FLMX Jul 6, 2026
- EWM Twice a year
- FLMX Twice a year
Distribution history
EWM vs FLMX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWM
- FLMX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWM 13.0%, betterFLMX 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWM 0.68, betterFLMX 0.55
- Worst fall
- EWM −22.2%, betterFLMX −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EWM 0.46FLMX 1.08
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.