EPOL ranks 3rd and EWM 4th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EPOL vs EWM
EWM −0.09pt a year
0.59%0.50%
EPOL 1.9×the volume
415K214K
EPOL +9.5pt
+11.9%+2.4%
EPOL vs EWM Performance
+123.6%+23.7%
- EPOL 0.59%
- EWM 0.50%, better
- EPOL $1.03B
- EWM $230M
- EPOL +34.1%, better
- EWM +7.8%
- EPOL 3.39%
- EWM 3.71%, better
- EPOL 37
- EWM 25
- EPOL 415K sh, better
- EWM 214K sh
- EPOL $43.43
- EWM $26.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EPOL | EWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A88Higher |
| Mission | B63Higher | C43 |
| Risk | A77 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | C54Higher | C41 |
| Durability | A79Higher | B56 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EPOL and EWM are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EPOLB
EWMB
In short
EPOL Poland in one ticket. Running since 2010, EPOL holds roughly 30 Polish stocks under MSCI's 25/50 capping rules, and it sits in the upper tier of single-country emerging-market funds.
EWM Malaysia in one ticker, running since 1996. EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia index, a cap-weighted slice of Kuala Lumpur's largest listed companies, and charges less than the typical single-country emerging markets fund.
Stated mandate
EPOL The fund seeks to track an index composed of Polish equities.
EWM The fund seeks to track an index composed of Malaysian equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EPOL vs EWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EPOL vs EWM Cost
Overpaying EPOL vs EWM
$1,656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EPOL 0.59%
$11,635
EWM 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EPOL | EWM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $900 | $158 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $3,460 | $591 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $9,979 | $1,656 |
- 0.59%EPOL
- 0.50%EWM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWM 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
EPOL 7th cheapest of 21 funds
EPOL vs EWM Dividends
- EPOL 3.39%
- EWM 3.71%, better
- EPOL $1.47
- EWM $1.00
- EPOL $0.30
- EWM $0.57
- EPOL Jun 15, 2026
- EWM Jun 15, 2026
- EPOL Jun 18, 2026
- EWM Jun 18, 2026
- EPOL Twice a year
- EWM Twice a year
Distribution history
EPOL vs EWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EPOL
- EWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EPOL 17.2%EWM 13.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EPOL 1.64, betterEWM 0.68
- Worst fall
- EPOL −53.6%EWM −22.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EPOL 0.70EWM 0.46
EPOL and EWM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
