FLKR ranks 15th and EWQ 16th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWQ vs FLKR
FLKR −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
FLKR 2.4×the volume
349K830K
FLKR +10.6pt
+5.0%+15.6%
EWQ vs FLKR Performance
+27.4%+106.4%
- EWQ 0.50%
- FLKR 0.09%, better
- EWQ $346M
- FLKR $1.79B
- EWQ −0.7%
- FLKR +61.1%, better
- EWQ 3.08%, better
- FLKR 2.94%
- EWQ 58
- FLKR 148
- EWQ 349K sh
- FLKR 830K sh, better
- EWQ $42.18
- FLKR $51.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWQ | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A82Higher | B57 |
| Risk | C42Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | B58Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | B58Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B61Higher | B60 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWQ and FLKR are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWQB
FLKRB
In short
EWQ One of the original country ETFs, running since 1996: about 60 French large and mid caps in one ticker. Fee sits right at the typical developed-market country fund, with a nearly three-decade record behind it.
FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.
Stated mandate
EWQ The fund seeks to track an index composed of French equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in France.
FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWQ vs FLKR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWQ vs FLKR Cost
Overpaying EWQ vs FLKR
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWQ 0.50%
$9,979
FLKR 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWQ | FLKR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWQ
- 0.09%FLKR, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLKR cheapest of 38 funds
EWQ 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWQ vs FLKR Dividends
- EWQ 3.08%, better
- FLKR 2.94%
- EWQ $1.32
- FLKR $1.47
- EWQ $1.09
- FLKR $0.30
- EWQ Jun 15, 2026
- FLKR Jun 26, 2026
- EWQ Jun 18, 2026
- FLKR Jul 6, 2026
- EWQ Twice a year
- FLKR Twice a year
Distribution history
EWQ vs FLKR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWQ
- FLKR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWQ 14.1%, betterFLKR 43.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWQ 0.45FLKR 0.97, better
- Worst fall
- EWQ −31.4%, betterFLKR −41.3%
- Market sensitivity
- EWQ 0.85FLKR 2.57
EWQ and FLKR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





