FLGB ranks 3rd and EWT 22nd of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWT vs FLGB
FLGB −0.50pt a year
0.59%0.09%
EWT 47.3×the volume
5.02M106K
EWT +7.1pt
+18.8%+11.7%
EWT vs FLGB Performance
+136.9%+74.3%
- EWT 0.59%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- EWT $11.1B
- FLGB $878M
- EWT +58.7%, better
- FLGB +15.9%
- EWT 2.79%
- FLGB 2.87%, better
- EWT 79
- FLGB 89
- EWT 5.02M sh, better
- FLGB 106K sh
- EWT $101.77
- FLGB $36.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWT | FLGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A93Higher |
| Mission | B60 | A73Higher |
| Risk | C40 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | B62 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | C53 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWT and FLGB are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWTC
FLGBA
In short
EWT Running since 2000, EWT is the veteran, heavily traded way to own Taiwan in one ticker: roughly 80 of the island's listed companies, tracking MSCI's capped Taiwan index.
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
Stated mandate
EWT The fund seeks to track an index composed of Taiwanese equities.
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWT vs FLGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWT vs FLGB Cost
Overpaying EWT vs FLGB
$9,737
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWT 0.59%
$11,635
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWT | FLGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $165 | $893 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $646 | $3,405 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $1,898 | $9,737 |
- 0.59%EWT
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
EWT 29th cheapest of 38 funds
EWT vs FLGB Dividends
- EWT 2.79%
- FLGB 2.87%, better
- EWT $2.82
- FLGB $1.06
- EWT $2.82
- FLGB $0.47
- EWT Dec 16, 2025
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- EWT Dec 19, 2025
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- EWT Annual
- FLGB Twice a year
Distribution history
EWT vs FLGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWT
- FLGB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWT 25.6%FLGB 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWT 1.32FLGB 1.44, better
- Worst fall
- EWT −38.9%FLGB −25.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EWT 1.17FLGB 0.75
EWT and FLGB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




