FLKR ranks 15th and EWT 22nd of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWT vs FLKR
FLKR −0.50pt a year
0.59%0.09%
EWT 6.0×the volume
5.02M830K
EWT +2.7pt
+18.8%+16.1%
EWT vs FLKR Performance
+136.9%+110.9%
- EWT 0.59%
- FLKR 0.09%, better
- EWT $11.1B
- FLKR $1.79B
- EWT +58.7%
- FLKR +62.5%, better
- EWT 2.79%
- FLKR 2.92%, better
- EWT 79
- FLKR 148
- EWT 5.02M sh, better
- FLKR 830K sh
- EWT $101.77
- FLKR $51.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWT | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A93Higher |
| Mission | B60Higher | B57 |
| Risk | C40Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | B62Higher | C50 |
| Durability | A82Higher | B60 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWT and FLKR are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWTC
FLKRB
In short
EWT Running since 2000, EWT is the veteran, heavily traded way to own Taiwan in one ticker: roughly 80 of the island's listed companies, tracking MSCI's capped Taiwan index.
FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.
Stated mandate
EWT The fund seeks to track an index composed of Taiwanese equities.
FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWT vs FLKR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWT vs FLKR Cost
Overpaying EWT vs FLKR
$9,737
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWT 0.59%
$11,635
FLKR 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWT | FLKR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $165 | $893 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $646 | $3,405 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $1,898 | $9,737 |
- 0.59%EWT
- 0.09%FLKR, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLKR cheapest of 38 funds
EWT 29th cheapest of 38 funds
EWT vs FLKR Dividends
- EWT 2.79%
- FLKR 2.92%, better
- EWT $2.82
- FLKR $1.47
- EWT $2.82
- FLKR $0.30
- EWT Dec 16, 2025
- FLKR Jun 26, 2026
- EWT Dec 19, 2025
- FLKR Jul 6, 2026
- EWT Annual
- FLKR Twice a year
Distribution history
EWT vs FLKR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWT
- FLKR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWT 25.6%, betterFLKR 43.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWT 1.32, betterFLKR 0.97
- Worst fall
- EWT −38.9%, betterFLKR −41.3%
- Market sensitivity
- EWT 1.17FLKR 2.57
EWT and FLKR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





