FLGB ranks 3rd and EWY 30th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWY vs FLGB
FLGB −0.50pt a year
0.59%0.09%
EWY 169.7×the volume
18M106K
EWY +4.7pt
+16.4%+11.7%
EWY vs FLGB Performance
+113.7%+74.3%
- EWY 0.59%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- EWY $22.3B
- FLGB $878M
- EWY +61.2%, better
- FLGB +15.9%
- EWY 1.33%
- FLGB 2.87%, better
- EWY 79
- FLGB 89
- EWY 18M sh, better
- FLGB 106K sh
- EWY $152.17
- FLGB $36.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWY | FLGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A93Higher |
| Mission | B57 | A73Higher |
| Risk | F24 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | B66Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | D38 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A84Higher | C53 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWY and FLGB are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWYC
FLGBA
In short
EWY Korea in one ticker since 2000: a multi-billion-dollar, heavily traded fund built on a capped index so no single conglomerate swallows the portfolio. Newer rivals charge far less for similar exposure.
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
Stated mandate
EWY The fund seeks to track an index of South Korean equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in South Korea.
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWY vs FLGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWY vs FLGB Cost
Overpaying EWY vs FLGB
$9,737
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWY 0.59%
$11,635
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWY | FLGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $165 | $893 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $646 | $3,405 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $1,898 | $9,737 |
- 0.59%EWY
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
EWY 29th cheapest of 38 funds
EWY vs FLGB Dividends
- EWY 1.33%
- FLGB 2.87%, better
- EWY $2.04
- FLGB $1.06
- EWY $2.04
- FLGB $0.47
- EWY Dec 16, 2025
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- EWY Dec 19, 2025
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- EWY Annual
- FLGB Twice a year
Distribution history
EWY vs FLGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWY
- FLGB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWY 43.8%FLGB 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWY 0.95FLGB 1.44, better
- Worst fall
- EWY −40.6%FLGB −25.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EWY 2.40FLGB 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





