ONOF ranks 3rd and EZMO 18th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
EZMO vs ONOF
ONOF −0.44pt a year
0.83%0.39%
ONOF 1.1×the volume
5.42K5.82K
EZMO vs ONOF Performance
−3.2%+7.7%
- EZMO 0.83%
- ONOF 0.39%, better
- EZMO $8M
- ONOF $140M
- EZMO −3.2%
- ONOF +7.7%, better
- EZMO
- ONOF 1.22%
- EZMO 5
- ONOF 504
- EZMO 5.42K sh
- ONOF 5.82K sh, better
- EZMO $25.31
- ONOF $40.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EZMO | ONOF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A95Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F21 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | D35 | A76Higher |
| Durability | D29 | B56Higher |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. EZMO and ONOF are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EZMOD
ONOFA
In short
EZMO Trend-following with a wider escape hatch: hold momentum-leading broad-market ETFs in bull mode, rotate into defensive ETFs like treasuries, bonds or gold when its bull/bear signal flags risk.
ONOF The ticker says it out loud: ONOF is an on/off switch. Four technical indicators decide whether it owns a broad basket of U.S. stocks or sits in short-term Treasuries. Rules, not hunches.
Stated mandate
EZMO The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the AlphaDroid EZMO Broad Markets Momentum Index. That index uses momentum strategies to select ETFs and can shift between bull and bear modes, including defensive ETFs when risk rises.
ONOF ONOF seeks to track the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index before fees and expenses. Its four technical indicators shift the Fund between U.S. equities and defensive short-term Treasuries.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EZMO vs ONOF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EZMO vs ONOF Cost
Overpaying EZMO vs ONOF
$7,961
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EZMO 0.83%
$15,859
ONOF 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EZMO | ONOF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,474 | $705 | $769 |
| 20 | $5,581 | $2,725 | $2,856 |
| 30 | $15,859 | $7,898 | $7,961 |
- 0.83%EZMO
- 0.39%ONOF, cheaper
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
ONOF 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
EZMO 15th cheapest of 20 funds
EZMO vs ONOF Dividends
- EZMO
- ONOF 1.22%
- EZMO None
- ONOF $0.49
- EZMO
- ONOF $0.16
- EZMO
- ONOF Jun 29, 2026
- EZMO
- ONOF Jul 2, 2026
- EZMO
- ONOF Twice a year
Distribution history
EZMO vs ONOF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EZMO 11.3%ONOF 12.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EZMO −0.57ONOF 0.82
- Worst fall
- EZMO −15.4%ONOF −26.2%
- Market sensitivity
- EZMO 0.19ONOF 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.83% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.