PTBD ranks 3rd and EZRO 42nd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
EZRO vs PTBD
PTBD −0.41pt a year
1.01%0.60%
PTBD 2.5×the volume
7.48K18.6K
EZRO vs PTBD Performance
+2.3%−0.1%
- EZRO 1.01%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- EZRO $27M
- PTBD $83M
- EZRO +2.3%, better
- PTBD −0.1%
- EZRO
- PTBD 6.36%
- EZRO 6
- PTBD 1047
- EZRO 7.48K sh
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- EZRO $26.56
- PTBD $18.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EZRO | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | A83Higher |
| Mission | D26 | |
| Risk | F13 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | B57Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | C40 | A90Higher |
| Durability | C48 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. EZRO and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EZROD
PTBDA
In short
EZRO A whole tactical playbook in one ticker. EZRO is a fund-of-funds tracking an index that ranks sector, subsector and defensive ETFs by momentum, then rotates among them by rule, at 1.01% a year.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
EZRO The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the AlphaDroid EZ-RO Defensive Sector Rotation Index. It uses a passive/indexing approach.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EZRO vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EZRO vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying EZRO vs PTBD
$7,033
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EZRO 1.01%
$18,850
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EZRO | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,780 | $1,076 | $704 |
| 20 | $6,686 | $4,116 | $2,570 |
| 30 | $18,850 | $11,817 | $7,033 |
- 1.01%EZRO
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
EZRO 30th cheapest of 46 funds
EZRO vs PTBD Dividends
- EZRO
- PTBD 6.36%
- EZRO None
- PTBD $1.17
- EZRO
- PTBD $0.10
- EZRO
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- EZRO
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- EZRO
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
EZRO vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EZRO 15.9%PTBD 5.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- EZRO −0.02PTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- EZRO −19.1%PTBD −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- EZRO 0.35PTBD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 1.01% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.