Skip to content

GMOD vs PTBD

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.10pt a year

GMOD0.50%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTBD 1.6×the volume

GMOD11.8KPTBD18.6K

GMOD vs PTBD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GMOD−0.1%PTBD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GMOD +11.8%. PTBD −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%2.5%5%7.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
PTBD 0.60%
Fund size
GMOD $49M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.8%, better
PTBD −0.1%
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
PTBD 6.36%
Holdings
GMOD 20
PTBD 1047
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh
PTBD 18.6K sh, better
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
PTBD $18.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODPTBD
Cost30% weightA90HigherA83
Mission25% weightA74Not scored
Risk15% weightA75HigherB60
Tradability15% weightA73HigherC50
Holdings10% weightB64A90Higher
Durability5% weightC49A83Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and PTBD 3rd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.
  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.
  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

GMOD vs PTBD Holdings

As of

How GMOD and PTBD differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GMOD and 0.0% of PTBD.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile78.7%

Sector

No Sector split for GMOD and PTBD.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GMOD and PTBD, widest gap first
CountryMore in GMODMore in PTBD
United StatesPTBD +19.0 points
JapanGMOD +4.9 points
TaiwanGMOD +2.9 points
SwitzerlandGMOD +1.9 points
South KoreaGMOD +1.7 points
FranceGMOD +1.5 points
LuxembourgPTBD +1.2 points
GermanyGMOD +1.1 points
Other countries (33)GMOD +6.0 points

Outside the US: GMOD 73% developed, 27% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GMOD78.4%
  • PTBD5.8%

Securities held

  • GMOD19
  • PTBD1,043

Asset class

GMOD
Multi-Asset
PTBD
Fixed Income

Holdings

  • Only in GMOD19
  • In both0
  • Only in PTBD1,043

Only in GMOD

19 securities, 100% of GMOD by weight

  • Ishares 7 10 Year Treasury Bon14.05%
  • Schwab Us Tips Etf10.09%
  • Gmo Us Quality Etf9.98%

Only in PTBD

1,043 securities, 97.5% of PTBD by weight

  • 1261229 BC Ltd 10% 04/15/20320.60%
  • EchoStar Corp 10.75% 11/30/20290.49%
  • Meridian Arc Holdco LLC 6.25% 04/30/20310.48%

Weight gaps

GMOD and PTBD share no securities.

All GMOD holdings⁠All 1,050 PTBD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying PTBD vs GMOD

$1,838

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PTBD $11,817GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODPTBDOverpaying
10$900$1,076$176
20$3,460$4,116$656
30$9,979$11,817$1,838

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 0.60%PTBD
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
PTBD 6.36%
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

GMOD vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025PTBD 5.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025PTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025PTBD −24.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48PTBD 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPBLB

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsPBLB

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.