Skip to content

PBL vs PTBD

PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

PBLBCboe

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PBL −0.15pt a year

PBL0.45%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTBD 3.7×the volume

PBL5.07KPTBD18.6K

3Y return · a year

PBL +10.8pt

PBL+15.7%PTBD+4.9%

PBL vs PTBD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.3%PBL−0.1%PTBD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PBL +7.3%. PTBD −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%2.5%5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PBL 0.45%, better
PTBD 0.60%
Fund size
PBL $71M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
PBL +7.3%, better
PTBD −0.1%
Yield (12M)
PBL 2.06%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Holdings
PBL 13
PTBD 1047
Avg volume (30D)
PBL 5.07K sh
PTBD 18.6K sh, better
NAV per share
PBL $33.73
PTBD $18.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PBL: Cost 93, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings not scored, Durability 64. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for PBL, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPBLPTBD
Cost30% weightA93HigherA83
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherB60
Tradability15% weightD29C50Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA90
Durability5% weightB64A83Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PBL and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and PBL 5th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 6BPWSPacer WealthShield ETFScore 67

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PBLBPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

PBL No data

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

PBL No data

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

PBL No data

  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

PBL No data

  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full PBL profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

PBL vs PTBD Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PBL vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying PTBD vs PBL

$2,776

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PBL 0.45%

    $9,041

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PBL 0.45%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PTBD $11,817PBL $9,041

Year by year

YearPBLPTBDOverpaying
10$812$1,076$264
20$3,128$4,116$988
30$9,041$11,817$2,776

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%PBL, cheaper
  • 0.60%PTBD
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

PBL 4th cheapest of 46 funds

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

PBL vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PBL 2.06%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Payout (12M)
PBL $0.68
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
PBL $0.68
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
PBL Dec 30, 2025
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
PBL Jan 2, 2026
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
PBL Annual
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

PBLAnnual · 3 paymentsAll PBL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $2.04; Dec 27, 2024 $1.94; Dec 30, 2025 $0.68. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD

PBL vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PBL 8.8%PTBD 5.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PBL 1.21, betterPTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PBL −11.6%since Dec 2022PTBD −24.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PBL 0.71PTBD 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • PBLBvsENDWA

    PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBLBvsGMODA

    PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsGMODA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBLBvsRISNA

    PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.