ILCV ranks 2nd and FAD 84th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FAD vs ILCV
ILCV −0.59pt a year
0.63%0.04%
ILCV 2.0×the volume
12.5K25.1K
FAD +1.5pt
+13.7%+12.2%
FAD vs ILCV Performance
+37.5%+79.9%
- FAD 0.63%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- FAD $571M
- ILCV $1.37B
- FAD +10.4%
- ILCV +22.4%, better
- FAD 0.09%
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- FAD 675
- ILCV 374
- FAD 12.5K sh
- ILCV 25.1K sh, better
- FAD $170.35
- ILCV $108.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAD | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A70 | A82Higher |
| Risk | F15 | A91Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | D39 |
| Durability | A70 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FAD and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FADC
ILCVA
In short
FAD FAD has run First Trust's AlphaDEX screen since 2007, ranking US stocks on growth and value marks and spreading the survivors across roughly 700 names, small caps included. Rules-based stock picking wearing an index wrapper.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
FAD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAD vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAD vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying FAD vs ILCV
$11,510
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAD 0.63%
$12,359
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAD | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,128 | $73 | $1,055 |
| 20 | $4,311 | $288 | $4,023 |
| 30 | $12,359 | $849 | $11,510 |
- 0.63%FAD
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
FAD 89th cheapest of 99 funds
FAD vs ILCV Dividends
- FAD 0.09%
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- FAD $0.15
- ILCV $1.65
- FAD $0.05
- ILCV $0.42
- FAD Sep 24, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- FAD Sep 30, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- FAD Quarterly
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
FAD vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAD
- ILCV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAD 17.9%ILCV 10.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FAD 1.03ILCV 1.57, better
- Worst fall
- FAD −32.0%ILCV −18.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FAD 1.18ILCV 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.63% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.