VONV ranks 1st and FAD 84th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FAD vs VONV
VONV −0.57pt a year
0.63%0.06%
VONV 61.9×the volume
12.5K776K
FAD +1.8pt
+13.7%+11.9%
FAD vs VONV Performance
+37.5%+73.9%
- FAD 0.63%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- FAD $571M
- VONV $21.7B
- FAD +10.4%
- VONV +30.6%, better
- FAD 0.09%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- FAD 675
- VONV 887
- FAD 12.5K sh
- VONV 776K sh, better
- FAD $170.35
- VONV $112.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAD | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A70 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F15 | A89Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | C49 |
| Durability | A70 | A92Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FAD and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FADC
VONVA
In short
FAD FAD has run First Trust's AlphaDEX screen since 2007, ranking US stocks on growth and value marks and spreading the survivors across roughly 700 names, small caps included. Rules-based stock picking wearing an index wrapper.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
FAD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAD vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAD vs VONV Cost
Overpaying FAD vs VONV
$11,089
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAD 0.63%
$12,359
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAD | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,128 | $110 | $1,018 |
| 20 | $4,311 | $432 | $3,879 |
| 30 | $12,359 | $1,270 | $11,089 |
- 0.63%FAD
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
FAD 89th cheapest of 99 funds
FAD vs VONV Dividends
- FAD 0.09%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- FAD $0.15
- VONV $1.74
- FAD $0.05
- VONV $0.42
- FAD Sep 24, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- FAD Sep 30, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- FAD Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
FAD vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAD
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAD 17.9%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FAD 1.03VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- FAD −32.0%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FAD 1.18VONV 0.85
FAD and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.63% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

