VYM ranks 2nd and FAD 84th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FAD vs VYM
VYM −0.59pt a year
0.63%0.04%
VYM 91.7×the volume
12.5K1.15M
FAD +2.0pt
+13.7%+11.7%
FAD vs VYM Performance
+37.5%+70.4%
- FAD 0.63%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- FAD $571M
- VYM $78.9B
- FAD +10.4%
- VYM +18.9%, better
- FAD 0.09%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- FAD 675
- VYM 610
- FAD 12.5K sh
- VYM 1.15M sh, better
- FAD $170.35
- VYM $159.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAD | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A70 | A81Higher |
| Risk | F15 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | C53 |
| Durability | A70 | A94Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FAD and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FADC
VYMA
In short
FAD FAD has run First Trust's AlphaDEX screen since 2007, ranking US stocks on growth and value marks and spreading the survivors across roughly 700 names, small caps included. Rules-based stock picking wearing an index wrapper.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
FAD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAD vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAD vs VYM Cost
Overpaying FAD vs VYM
$11,510
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAD 0.63%
$12,359
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAD | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,128 | $73 | $1,055 |
| 20 | $4,311 | $288 | $4,023 |
| 30 | $12,359 | $849 | $11,510 |
- 0.63%FAD
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
FAD 89th cheapest of 99 funds
FAD vs VYM Dividends
- FAD 0.09%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- FAD $0.15
- VYM $3.68
- FAD $0.05
- VYM $0.89
- FAD Sep 24, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- FAD Sep 30, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- FAD Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
FAD vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAD
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAD 17.9%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FAD 1.03VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- FAD −32.0%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FAD 1.18VYM 0.74
FAD and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.63% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


