SCYB ranks 1st and FALN 23rd of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
FALN vs SCYB
SCYB −0.22pt a year
0.25%0.03%
SCYB 1.2×the volume
912K1.1M
FALN +0.1pt
+8.5%+8.4%
FALN vs SCYB Performance
+0.5%+2.0%
- FALN 0.25%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- FALN $1.72B
- SCYB $2.8B
- FALN +0.5%
- SCYB +2.0%, better
- FALN 6.80%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- FALN 159
- SCYB 1844
- FALN 912K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- FALN $25.82
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FALN | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A91 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D29 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | B63 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | C47 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A89Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. FALN and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FALNB
SCYBA
In short
FALN Downgrades are the shopping list. FALN holds dollar bonds that were investment grade until the ratings cut, keeps any one issuer to 3% of the index, and charges 0.25% for it. Roughly 160 bonds, income paid monthly.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
FALN The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. dollar-denominated high-yield corporate bonds that were previously rated investment grade.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FALN vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FALN vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying FALN vs SCYB
$4,521
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FALN 0.25%
$5,159
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FALN | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $55 | $400 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $216 | $1,553 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $638 | $4,521 |
- 0.25%FALN
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
FALN 18th cheapest of 84 funds
FALN vs SCYB Dividends
- FALN 6.80%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- FALN $1.76
- SCYB $1.80
- FALN $0.15
- SCYB $0.16
- FALN Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- FALN Oct 6, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- FALN Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
FALN vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FALN 6.1%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FALN 0.65SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- FALN −18.8%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FALN 0.86SCYB 0.28
FALN and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
