UDOW ranks 2nd and FAS 3rd of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
FAS vs UDOW
FAS −0.06pt a year
0.88%0.94%
UDOW 4.2×the volume
413K1.72M
UDOW +1.4pt
+20.9%+22.3%
FAS vs UDOW Performance
+31.4%+66.5%
- FAS 0.88%, better
- UDOW 0.94%
- FAS $2.17B
- UDOW $841M
- FAS +12.3%
- UDOW +16.0%, better
- FAS 8.87%, better
- UDOW 1.06%
- FAS 87
- UDOW 33
- FAS 413K sh
- UDOW 1.72M sh, better
- FAS $168.18
- UDOW $65.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAS | UDOW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A77 | |
| Risk | B69 | A85Higher |
| Tradability | A73 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | |
| Durability | B66 | A71Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. FAS and UDOW are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FASA
UDOWA
In short
FAS Born in November 2008 with the banking system on fire, FAS aims to deliver three times the daily move of the Financial Select Sector Index. A one-day tool on roughly 80 financial stocks, built around a single-day objective.
UDOW The only 3x daily play on the Dow: 30 blue-chip names, price-weighted, reset every session. It is the industrial cousin of the semis-and-Nasdaq crowd that fills the leveraged aisle, and it has run since 2010.
Stated mandate
FAS The fund seeks a daily return equal to three times the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses. It is designed for a single-day objective rather than a multiple of the index’s cumulative return over longer periods.
UDOW The Fund seeks daily results equal to three times the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average before fees and expenses. It uses equity securities, derivatives, and money-market instruments to pursue that daily leveraged exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAS vs UDOW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAS vs UDOW Cost
Overpaying UDOW vs FAS
$999
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAS 0.88%
$16,705
UDOW 0.94%
$17,704
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAS | UDOW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,559 | $1,661 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,891 | $6,260 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,705 | $17,704 | $999 |
- 0.88%FAS, cheaper
- 0.94%UDOW
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
FAS 4th cheapest of 30 funds
UDOW 7th cheapest of 30 funds
FAS vs UDOW Dividends
- FAS 8.87%, better
- UDOW 1.06%
- FAS $14.62
- UDOW $0.69
- FAS $1.00
- UDOW $0.15
- FAS Sep 22, 2026
- UDOW Sep 23, 2026
- FAS Sep 29, 2026
- UDOW Sep 29, 2026
- FAS Quarterly
- UDOW Quarterly
Distribution history
FAS vs UDOW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAS
- UDOW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAS 46.3%UDOW 37.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FAS 1.03, betterUDOW 0.95
- Worst fall
- FAS −66.9%UDOW −56.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FAS 2.63UDOW 2.62
Popular comparisons
- 0.88% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.90%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.90%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.