SIXJ ranks 4th and FAUG 42nd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
FAUG vs SIXJ
SIXJ −0.11pt a year
0.85%0.74%
FAUG 4.1×the volume
61.4K15.1K
FAUG +0.9pt
+15.8%+14.9%
FAUG vs SIXJ Performance
+9.5%+10.5%
- FAUG 0.85%
- SIXJ 0.74%, better
- FAUG $1.44B
- SIXJ $149M
- FAUG +9.5%
- SIXJ +10.5%, better
- FAUG 3
- SIXJ 3
- FAUG 61.4K sh, better
- SIXJ 15.1K sh
- FAUG $57.38
- SIXJ $37.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAUG | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | B68Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | C53 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | A94Higher | A70 |
| Holdings | C53 | C53 |
| Durability | A91Higher | B57 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. FAUG and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FAUGC
SIXJB
In short
FAUG First Trust's August-reset buffer fund absorbs the first 10% of a one-year price decline in the S&P 500 tracker it follows, and caps your upside in exchange. Running since 2019, an early arrival in what is now a crowded category.
SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.
Stated mandate
FAUG The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 10% of the underlying ETF's losses during the stated outcome period.
SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAUG vs SIXJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAUG vs SIXJ Cost
Overpaying FAUG vs SIXJ
$1,892
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAUG 0.85%
$16,199
SIXJ 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAUG | SIXJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,319 | $189 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,015 | $691 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $14,307 | $1,892 |
- 0.85%FAUG
- 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds
FAUG 60th cheapest of 77 funds
FAUG vs SIXJ Dividends
- FAUG None
- SIXJ None
Distribution history
FAUG vs SIXJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAUG 7.3%SIXJ 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FAUG 1.45SIXJ 1.67, better
- Worst fall
- FAUG −15.9%SIXJ −14.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FAUG 0.63SIXJ 0.46
FAUG and SIXJ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
