Skip to content

FAUG vs SIXJ

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August

FAUGCCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

SIXJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

SIXJ −0.11pt a year

FAUG0.85%SIXJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

FAUG 4.1×the volume

FAUG61.4KSIXJ15.1K

3Y return · a year

FAUG +0.9pt

FAUG+15.8%SIXJ+14.9%

FAUG vs SIXJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.5%FAUG+10.5%SIXJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FAUG +9.5%. SIXJ +10.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FAUG 0.85%
SIXJ 0.74%, better
Fund size
FAUG $1.44B
SIXJ $149M
1Y total return
FAUG +9.5%
SIXJ +10.5%, better
Holdings
FAUG 3
SIXJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
FAUG 61.4K sh, better
SIXJ 15.1K sh
NAV per share
FAUG $57.38
SIXJ $37.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FAUG: Cost 11, Risk 53, Mission 95, Tradability 94, Holdings 53, Durability 91. SIXJ: Cost 68, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 53, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for FAUG, SIXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFAUGSIXJ
Cost30% weightF11B68Higher
Mission25% weightA95Not scored
Risk15% weightC53B67Higher
Tradability15% weightA94HigherA70
Holdings10% weightC53C53
Durability5% weightA91HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FAUG and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXJ ranks 4th and FAUG 42nd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BBUFMAB Moderate Buffer ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 42CBDECInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 47
  7. Rank 42CFAUGFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - AugustScore 47
  8. Rank 44CDECZTrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETFScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FAUGCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August

SIXJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

FAUG First Trust's August-reset buffer fund absorbs the first 10% of a one-year price decline in the S&P 500 tracker it follows, and caps your upside in exchange. Running since 2019, an early arrival in what is now a crowded category.

SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.

Stated mandate

FAUG The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 10% of the underlying ETF's losses during the stated outcome period.

SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • FAUG The trade is spelled out: first 10% of the reference ETF's price loss absorbed, upside stopped at a cap, dividends left out, clock reset every August.
  • One slot in a full twelve-fund calendar (FJAN through FDEC), so an investor can enter on the August cycle or spread entries across reset months.
  • Live since 2019 and reset every August since, so the mechanics have run through real markets rather than model assumptions.
  • SIXJ The 10% buffer and the cap reset every January 1 and July 1, so terms refresh twice a year instead of on the usual annual clock.
  • 0.74% expense ratio, on the lean side for a defined-outcome fund and below the typical fee among its shallow-buffer peers.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, the original S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is keyed to a plain vanilla benchmark rather than a bespoke index.
  • Rates among the stronger implementations in a crowded shallow-buffer field, alongside AllianzIM's other six-month siblings like SIXZ and SIXD.

Worth knowing

  • FAUG At 0.85% a year it sits at the pricier end of the buffer shelf: ZALT runs 0.69% and the laddered BUFB 0.10% for related takes on the same idea.
  • Buffer and cap are set for the whole outcome period. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever cushion and headroom remain, not the headline terms.
  • Trades lightly next to the category's busiest names, so spreads can be part of the entry cost.
  • SIXJ Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full six-month period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room remain at that moment.
  • It tracks SPY's share-price return, so dividends aren't passed through and the fund isn't structured to pay income.
  • Volume is light next to the largest buffer funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider, especially in fast-moving markets.

Full FAUG profile⁠

Full SIXJ profile⁠

FAUG vs SIXJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FAUG vs SIXJ Cost

Overpaying FAUG vs SIXJ

$1,892

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FAUG 0.85%

    $16,199

  • SIXJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FAUG 0.85%
  • SIXJ 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FAUG $16,199SIXJ $14,307

Year by year

YearFAUGSIXJOverpaying
10$1,508$1,319$189
20$5,706$5,015$691
30$16,199$14,307$1,892

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FAUG
  • 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

FAUG 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FAUG vs SIXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
FAUG None
SIXJ None

Distribution history

FAUGAll FAUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIXJAll SIXJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FAUG vs SIXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FAUG 7.3%SIXJ 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FAUG 1.45SIXJ 1.67, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FAUG −15.9%SIXJ −14.1%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FAUG 0.63SIXJ 0.46

FAUG and SIXJ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FAUGCvsZALTA

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FAUGCvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FAUGCvsTENJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.