Skip to content

FB vs QBSV

ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF

FBCCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

QBSVCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

FB −0.06pt a year

FB0.58%QBSV0.64%

Avg volume · 30D

QBSV 2.2×the volume

FB1.99KQBSV4.32K

FB vs QBSV Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.1%FB+1.0%QBSV

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. FB +2.1%. QBSV +1.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%3%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FB 0.58%, better
QBSV 0.64%
Fund size
FB $4M
QBSV $28M
1Y total return
FB +10.3%
QBSV No data
Yield (12M)
FB 1.83%
QBSV No data
Holdings
FB 502
QBSV 3
Avg volume (30D)
FB 1.99K sh
QBSV 4.32K sh, better
NAV per share
FB $45.42
QBSV $27.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FB: Cost 65, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings 80, Durability 38. QBSV: Cost 53, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 38, Holdings 46, Durability 31.
Pillar letters and Scores for FB, QBSV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFBQBSV
Cost30% weightB65HigherC53
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA76A76
Tradability15% weightB56HigherD38
Holdings10% weightA80HigherC46
Durability5% weightD38HigherD31

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FB and QBSV are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

QBSV ranks 3rd and FB 4th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BSWANAmplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETFScore 60
  2. Rank 2BPSFFPacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 3CQBSVAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 4CFBProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 4CHJUNCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FBCProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF

QBSVCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

In short

FB Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month outcome period. FB resets daily, using one-day S&P 500 options to set a fresh cap and cushion sized to what the market expects volatility to be.

QBSV No data

Stated mandate

FB The fund seeks participation in S&P 500 gains while mitigating daily losses and reducing volatility. It uses long exposure and one-day options on the index; daily upside caps and downside buffers are adjusted according to expected market volatility.

QBSV No data

Why people hold it

  • FB The reset is daily, not annual. One-day options set a new upside cap and downside buffer each session, so there's no waiting out a year-long period to start over.proshares.com
  • Cap and buffer flex with expected volatility instead of being fixed for a year, tightening or widening as conditions change.proshares.com
  • At 0.58%, it undercuts the typical buffer fund's fee, including BUFR at 0.95% and BAPR at 0.79%.
  • Plain plumbing under the hood: long S&P 500 exposure plus index options, with quarterly distributions.

QBSV No data

Worth knowing

  • FB Daily buffers cushion daily moves. A slow grind lower over many sessions can still add up, since each day's protection applies only to that day.proshares.com
  • Launched in 2025, so the record is short and hasn't been tested across different market regimes.
  • Small and lightly traded compared with established buffer funds, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads at the point of trade.

QBSV No data

Full FB profile⁠

Full QBSV profile⁠

FB vs QBSV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FB vs QBSV Cost

Overpaying QBSV vs FB

$1,085

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FB 0.58%

    $11,453

  • QBSV 0.64%

    $12,538

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FB 0.58%
  • QBSV 0.64%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530QBSV $12,538FB $11,453

Year by year

YearFBQBSVOverpaying
10$1,041$1,145$104
20$3,986$4,375$389
30$11,453$12,538$1,085

Expense ratio

  • 0.58%FB, cheaper
  • 0.64%QBSV
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer funds
  • Median 0.64%

FB 3rd cheapest of 7 funds

QBSV 4th cheapest of 7 funds

FB vs QBSV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FB 1.83%
QBSV No data
Payout (12M)
FB $0.83
QBSV None
Last payment
FB $0.09
QBSV No data
Ex-dividend
FB Sep 23, 2026
QBSV No data
Paid on
FB Sep 29, 2026
QBSV No data
Frequency
FB Quarterly
QBSV No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

FBQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll FB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Sep 24, 2025 $0.14; Dec 24, 2025 $0.24; Mar 25, 2026 $0.16; Jun 24, 2026 $0.34; Sep 23, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
QBSVAll QBSV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FB vs QBSV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FB 3.1%since Jul 2025QBSV No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FB 2.14since Jul 2025QBSV No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FB −1.7%since Jun 2025QBSV No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FB 0.24QBSV 0.18

Popular comparisons

  • FBCvsSWANB

    ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF · Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBSVCvsSWANB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF · Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.64% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FBCvsPSFFB

    ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBSVCvsPSFFB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.64% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FBCvsHJUNC

    ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF · Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBSVCvsHJUNC

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF · Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series

    Expense ratio
    0.64% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.