Skip to content

FB vs HJUN

ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF

FBCCboe

Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series

HJUNCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

HJUN −0.28pt a year

FB0.58%HJUN0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

FB 1.9×the volume

FB1.99KHJUN1.03K

FB vs HJUN Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.1%FB+1.0%HJUN

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. FB +2.1%. HJUN +1.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%3%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FB 0.58%
HJUN 0.30%, better
Fund size
FB $4M
HJUN $3M
1Y total return
FB +10.3%
HJUN No data
Yield (12M)
FB 1.83%
HJUN No data
Holdings
FB 502
HJUN 4
Avg volume (30D)
FB 1.99K sh, better
HJUN 1.03K sh
NAV per share
FB $45.42
HJUN $25.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FB: Cost 65, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings 80, Durability 38. HJUN: Cost 91, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 9, Holdings not scored, Durability 13.
Pillar letters and Scores for FB, HJUN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFBHJUN
Cost30% weightB65A91Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA76HigherB60
Tradability15% weightB56HigherF9
Holdings10% weightA80Not scored
Durability5% weightD38HigherF13

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FB and HJUN are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

FB ranks 4th and HJUN 4th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BSWANAmplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETFScore 60
  2. Rank 2BPSFFPacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 3CQBSVAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 4CFBProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 4CHJUNCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40
  6. Rank 6DDHSBDay Hagan Smart Buffer ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FBCProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF

HJUNCCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series

In short

FB Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month outcome period. FB resets daily, using one-day S&P 500 options to set a fresh cap and cushion sized to what the market expects volatility to be.

HJUN No data

Stated mandate

FB The fund seeks participation in S&P 500 gains while mitigating daily losses and reducing volatility. It uses long exposure and one-day options on the index; daily upside caps and downside buffers are adjusted according to expected market volatility.

HJUN No data

Why people hold it

  • FB The reset is daily, not annual. One-day options set a new upside cap and downside buffer each session, so there's no waiting out a year-long period to start over.proshares.com
  • Cap and buffer flex with expected volatility instead of being fixed for a year, tightening or widening as conditions change.proshares.com
  • At 0.58%, it undercuts the typical buffer fund's fee, including BUFR at 0.95% and BAPR at 0.79%.
  • Plain plumbing under the hood: long S&P 500 exposure plus index options, with quarterly distributions.

HJUN No data

Worth knowing

  • FB Daily buffers cushion daily moves. A slow grind lower over many sessions can still add up, since each day's protection applies only to that day.proshares.com
  • Launched in 2025, so the record is short and hasn't been tested across different market regimes.
  • Small and lightly traded compared with established buffer funds, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads at the point of trade.

HJUN No data

Full FB profile⁠

Full HJUN profile⁠

FB vs HJUN Holdings

How FB and HJUN differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of FB and 0.0% of HJUN.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile99.8%

Sector

No Sector split for FB.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FB and HJUN, widest gap first
CountryMore in FBMore in HJUN
United StatesFB +0.3 points
SwitzerlandHJUN +0.2 points
ChinaHJUN +0.1 points
MexicoHJUN +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FB41.6%
  • HJUN101.9%

Securities held

  • FB501
  • HJUN3

Asset class

FB
Equity
HJUN
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FB501
  • In both0
  • Only in HJUN3

Only in FB

501 securities, 90.7% of FB by weight

  • Apple Inc6.99%
  • NVIDIA Corp6.89%
  • Microsoft Corp5.39%

Only in HJUN

3 securities, 100% of HJUN by weight

  • Spy 05/28/2027 151.71 C77.75%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.5% 05/31/202719.15%
  • Spy 05/28/2027 758.54 P4.09%

Weight gaps

FB and HJUN share no securities.

All FB holdings⁠All HJUN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FB vs HJUN Cost

Overpaying FB vs HJUN

$5,304

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FB 0.58%

    $11,453

  • HJUN 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FB 0.58%
  • HJUN 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530FB $11,453HJUN $6,149

Year by year

YearFBHJUNOverpaying
10$1,041$545$496
20$3,986$2,113$1,873
30$11,453$6,149$5,304

Expense ratio

  • 0.58%FB
  • 0.30%HJUN, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer funds
  • Median 0.64%

HJUN cheapest of 7 funds

FB 3rd cheapest of 7 funds

FB vs HJUN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FB 1.83%
HJUN No data
Payout (12M)
FB $0.83
HJUN None
Last payment
FB $0.09
HJUN No data
Ex-dividend
FB Sep 23, 2026
HJUN No data
Paid on
FB Sep 29, 2026
HJUN No data
Frequency
FB Quarterly
HJUN No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

FBQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll FB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Sep 24, 2025 $0.14; Dec 24, 2025 $0.24; Mar 25, 2026 $0.16; Jun 24, 2026 $0.34; Sep 23, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
HJUNAll HJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FB vs HJUN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FB 3.1%since Jul 2025HJUN No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FB 2.14since Jul 2025HJUN No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FB −1.7%since Jun 2025HJUN No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FB 0.24HJUN 0.21

Popular comparisons

  • FBCvsSWANB

    ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF · Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HJUNCvsSWANB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series · Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FBCvsPSFFB

    ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HJUNCvsPSFFB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series · Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FBCvsQBSVC

    ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.64%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HJUNCvsQBSVC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series · AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.64%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.