XLE ranks 1st and FCG 12th of 24 funds in the Energy (Broad) Category.
FCG vs XLE
XLE −0.51pt a year
0.59%0.08%
XLE 38.5×the volume
785K30.2M
XLE +6.0pt
+5.9%+11.9%
FCG vs XLE Performance
+106.1%+190.1%
- FCG 0.59%
- XLE 0.08%, better
- FCG $728M
- XLE $45.3B
- FCG +49.3%
- XLE +63.4%, better
- FCG 2.02%
- XLE 2.18%, better
- FCG 42
- XLE 24
- FCG 785K sh
- XLE 30.2M sh, better
- FCG $32.64
- XLE $68.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FCG | XLE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | A98Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F8 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | B67 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | A87Higher | D37 |
| Durability | B69 | A88Higher |
Rank among Energy (Broad) funds
Same Category. FCG and XLE are both graded against the same 24 Energy (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FCGC
XLEA
In short
FCG Most "energy" ETFs are oil funds in a wider coat. FCG skips that framing: it tracks a Nasdaq FactSet natural gas index, about 40 names deep, and has been running the same pure-gas mandate since 2007.
XLE The 1998 original and still the default way to trade US energy: XLE holds only the oil, gas and oilfield services names inside the S&P 500, capped-weighted, for 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
FCG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq FactSet Natural Gas Index.
XLE The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally track the price and yield performance of the Energy Select Sector Index before expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FCG vs XLE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FCG vs XLE Cost
Overpaying FCG vs XLE
$9,946
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FCG 0.59%
$11,635
XLE 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FCG | XLE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $147 | $911 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $575 | $3,476 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $1,689 | $9,946 |
- 0.59%FCG
- 0.08%XLE, cheaper
- Middle half of Energy (Broad) funds
- Median 0.46%
XLE cheapest of 24 funds
FCG 14th cheapest of 24 funds
FCG vs XLE Dividends
- FCG 2.02%
- XLE 2.18%, better
- FCG $0.66
- XLE $1.52
- FCG $0.19
- XLE $0.38
- FCG Sep 24, 2026
- XLE Sep 21, 2026
- FCG Sep 30, 2026
- XLE Sep 23, 2026
- FCG Quarterly
- XLE Quarterly
Distribution history
FCG vs XLE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FCG
- XLE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FCG 24.5%XLE 21.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FCG 0.36XLE 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- FCG −33.3%XLE −26.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FCG −0.11XLE −0.02
FCG and XLE in the news


Category Rankings
Chips, AI and crypto took October's losses




Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.