FDEV ranks 4th and GLOF 7th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
FDEV vs GLOF
FDEV −0.02pt a year
0.18%0.20%
FDEV 1.2×the volume
29.3K23.6K
GLOF +4.0pt
+7.8%+11.8%
FDEV vs GLOF Performance
+45.8%+75.1%
- FDEV 0.18%, better
- GLOF 0.20%
- FDEV $276M
- GLOF $202M
- FDEV +16.6%, better
- GLOF +14.5%
- FDEV 3.27%, better
- GLOF 1.57%
- FDEV 210
- GLOF 683
- FDEV 29.3K sh, better
- GLOF 23.6K sh
- FDEV $37.31
- GLOF $59.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDEV | GLOF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | A86 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A78Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | B59 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | C48Higher | D33 |
| Durability | C42 | B60Higher |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDEV and GLOF are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDEVA
GLOFB
In short
FDEV Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one developed-markets index fund at 0.18% a year. Fidelity's answer to paying up for a single-factor tilt overseas.
GLOF Most factor funds in this corner stop at the US border. GLOF doesn't: one fund, roughly 700 large- and mid-cap stocks across developed and emerging markets, weighted toward value, quality, momentum, low volatility and smaller size.
Stated mandate
FDEV The fund seeks returns generally corresponding to the Fidelity International Multifactor Index before fees and expenses.
GLOF The fund seeks to track an index of large- and mid-capitalization developed- and emerging-market stocks selected for favorable exposure to target style factors, subject to constraints.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDEV vs GLOF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDEV vs GLOF Cost
Overpaying GLOF vs FDEV
$406
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDEV 0.18%
$3,749
GLOF 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDEV | GLOF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $365 | $37 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $1,421 | $140 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $4,155 | $406 |
- 0.18%FDEV, cheaper
- 0.20%GLOF
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
FDEV 3rd cheapest of 30 funds
GLOF 5th cheapest of 30 funds
FDEV vs GLOF Dividends
- FDEV 3.27%, better
- GLOF 1.57%
- FDEV $1.22
- GLOF $0.93
- FDEV $0.33
- GLOF $0.45
- FDEV Sep 18, 2026
- GLOF Jun 15, 2026
- FDEV Sep 22, 2026
- GLOF Jun 18, 2026
- FDEV Quarterly
- GLOF Twice a year
Distribution history
FDEV vs GLOF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDEV
- GLOF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDEV 10.5%, betterGLOF 11.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDEV 1.31GLOF 1.55, better
- Worst fall
- FDEV −27.9%GLOF −25.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FDEV 0.65GLOF 0.91
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.