GSWO ranks 3rd and GLOF 7th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
GLOF vs GSWO
GSWO −0.05pt a year
0.20%0.15%
GSWO 2.7×the volume
23.6K64K
GLOF vs GSWO Performance
+0.3%+0.5%
- GLOF 0.20%
- GSWO 0.15%, better
- GLOF $202M
- GSWO $1.79B
- GLOF +14.5%
- GSWO
- GLOF 1.57%, better
- GSWO 1.46%
- GLOF 683
- GSWO 751
- GLOF 23.6K sh
- GSWO 64K sh, better
- GLOF $59.28
- GSWO $64.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GLOF | GSWO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86 | A98Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | A71 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | D33Higher | F22 |
| Durability | B60 | B62Higher |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. GLOF and GSWO are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GLOFB
GSWOA
In short
GLOF Most factor funds in this corner stop at the US border. GLOF doesn't: one fund, roughly 700 large- and mid-cap stocks across developed and emerging markets, weighted toward value, quality, momentum, low volatility and smaller size.
GSWO Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) on developed markets outside the US, for 15 basis points. Goldman's ActiveBeta rules at a price closer to an index fund than an active one.
Stated mandate
GLOF The fund seeks to track an index of large- and mid-capitalization developed- and emerging-market stocks selected for favorable exposure to target style factors, subject to constraints.
GSWO The fund is an ActiveBeta World Equity ETF designed to track an ActiveBeta Index and provide exposure to value, momentum, quality, and low-volatility characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GLOF vs GSWO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GLOF vs GSWO Cost
Overpaying GLOF vs GSWO
$1,018
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GLOF 0.20%
$4,155
GSWO 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GLOF | GSWO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $274 | $91 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $1,071 | $350 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $3,137 | $1,018 |
- 0.20%GLOF
- 0.15%GSWO, cheaper
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
GSWO cheapest of 30 funds
GLOF 5th cheapest of 30 funds
GLOF vs GSWO Dividends
- GLOF 1.57%, better
- GSWO 1.46%
- GLOF $0.93
- GSWO $0.93
- GLOF $0.45
- GSWO $0.20
- GLOF Jun 15, 2026
- GSWO Sep 24, 2026
- GLOF Jun 18, 2026
- GSWO Sep 30, 2026
- GLOF Twice a year
- GSWO Quarterly
Distribution history
GLOF vs GSWO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GLOF 11.4%GSWO
- Return per unit of risk
- GLOF 1.55GSWO
- Worst fall
- GLOF −25.1%GSWO
- Market sensitivity
- GLOF 0.91GSWO 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.