INTF ranks 1st and FDEV 4th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
FDEV vs INTF
INTF −0.02pt a year
0.18%0.16%
INTF 10.6×the volume
29.3K309K
INTF +2.8pt
+7.8%+10.6%
FDEV vs INTF Performance
+45.8%+65.8%
- FDEV 0.18%
- INTF 0.16%, better
- FDEV $276M
- INTF $3.7B
- FDEV +16.6%
- INTF +17.0%, better
- FDEV 3.27%, better
- INTF 3.02%
- FDEV 210
- INTF 501
- FDEV 29.3K sh
- INTF 309K sh, better
- FDEV $37.31
- INTF $41.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDEV | INTF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91 | A98Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A78Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | B59 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | C48 | B68Higher |
| Durability | C42 | A86Higher |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDEV and INTF are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDEVA
INTFA
In short
FDEV Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one developed-markets index fund at 0.18% a year. Fidelity's answer to paying up for a single-factor tilt overseas.
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
Stated mandate
FDEV The fund seeks returns generally corresponding to the Fidelity International Multifactor Index before fees and expenses.
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDEV vs INTF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDEV vs INTF Cost
Overpaying FDEV vs INTF
$407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDEV 0.18%
$3,749
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDEV | INTF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $292 | $36 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $1,141 | $140 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $3,342 | $407 |
- 0.18%FDEV
- 0.16%INTF, cheaper
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
FDEV 3rd cheapest of 30 funds
FDEV vs INTF Dividends
- FDEV 3.27%, better
- INTF 3.02%
- FDEV $1.22
- INTF $1.24
- FDEV $0.33
- INTF $0.72
- FDEV Sep 18, 2026
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- FDEV Sep 22, 2026
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- FDEV Quarterly
- INTF Twice a year
Distribution history
FDEV vs INTF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDEV
- INTF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDEV 10.5%, betterINTF 11.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDEV 1.31INTF 1.45, better
- Worst fall
- FDEV −27.9%INTF −27.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FDEV 0.65INTF 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.