FDEV ranks 4th and IMFL 19th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
FDEV vs IMFL
FDEV −0.16pt a year
0.18%0.34%
IMFL 2.3×the volume
29.3K68.4K
IMFL +0.8pt
+7.8%+8.6%
FDEV vs IMFL Performance
+45.8%+51.1%
- FDEV 0.18%, better
- IMFL 0.34%
- FDEV $276M
- IMFL $1.1B
- FDEV +16.6%
- IMFL +21.0%, better
- FDEV 3.27%
- IMFL 3.44%, better
- FDEV 210
- IMFL 1159
- FDEV 29.3K sh
- IMFL 68.4K sh, better
- FDEV $37.31
- IMFL $33.41
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDEV | IMFL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A78Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | C48Higher | C45 |
| Durability | C42 | B60Higher |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDEV and IMFL are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDEVA
IMFLC
In short
FDEV Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one developed-markets index fund at 0.18% a year. Fidelity's answer to paying up for a single-factor tilt overseas.
IMFL Most international factor funds pick a factor mix and leave it alone. IMFL re-weights monthly, letting Invesco's regime model read where the economy sits in its cycle and shift the tilt across value, momentum, quality, low volatility and size.
Stated mandate
FDEV The fund seeks returns generally corresponding to the Fidelity International Multifactor Index before fees and expenses.
IMFL The Fund is based on the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index and invests at least 80% of its total assets in securities included in that Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDEV vs IMFL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDEV vs IMFL Cost
Overpaying IMFL vs FDEV
$3,183
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDEV 0.18%
$3,749
IMFL 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDEV | IMFL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $616 | $288 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,386 | $1,105 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $6,932 | $3,183 |
- 0.18%FDEV, cheaper
- 0.34%IMFL
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
FDEV 3rd cheapest of 30 funds
IMFL 15th cheapest of 30 funds
FDEV vs IMFL Dividends
- FDEV 3.27%
- IMFL 3.44%, better
- FDEV $1.22
- IMFL $1.15
- FDEV $0.33
- IMFL $0.39
- FDEV Sep 18, 2026
- IMFL Sep 21, 2026
- FDEV Sep 22, 2026
- IMFL Sep 25, 2026
- FDEV Quarterly
- IMFL Quarterly
Distribution history
FDEV vs IMFL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDEV
- IMFL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDEV 10.5%, betterIMFL 13.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDEV 1.31, betterIMFL 1.04
- Worst fall
- FDEV −27.9%, betterIMFL −31.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FDEV 0.65IMFL 0.86
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.