INTF ranks 1st and IMFL 19th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
IMFL vs INTF
INTF −0.18pt a year
0.34%0.16%
INTF 4.5×the volume
68.4K309K
INTF +2.0pt
+8.6%+10.6%
IMFL vs INTF Performance
+51.1%+65.8%
- IMFL 0.34%
- INTF 0.16%, better
- IMFL $1.1B
- INTF $3.7B
- IMFL +21.0%, better
- INTF +17.0%
- IMFL 3.44%, better
- INTF 3.02%
- IMFL 1159
- INTF 501
- IMFL 68.4K sh
- INTF 309K sh, better
- IMFL $33.41
- INTF $41.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMFL | INTF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A98Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D38 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | B68Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A86Higher |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. IMFL and INTF are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMFLC
INTFA
In short
IMFL Most international factor funds pick a factor mix and leave it alone. IMFL re-weights monthly, letting Invesco's regime model read where the economy sits in its cycle and shift the tilt across value, momentum, quality, low volatility and size.
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
Stated mandate
IMFL The Fund is based on the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index and invests at least 80% of its total assets in securities included in that Index.
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMFL vs INTF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMFL vs INTF Cost
Overpaying IMFL vs INTF
$3,590
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMFL 0.34%
$6,932
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMFL | INTF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $616 | $292 | $324 |
| 20 | $2,386 | $1,141 | $1,245 |
| 30 | $6,932 | $3,342 | $3,590 |
- 0.34%IMFL
- 0.16%INTF, cheaper
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
IMFL 15th cheapest of 30 funds
IMFL vs INTF Dividends
- IMFL 3.44%, better
- INTF 3.02%
- IMFL $1.15
- INTF $1.24
- IMFL $0.39
- INTF $0.72
- IMFL Sep 21, 2026
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- IMFL Sep 25, 2026
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- IMFL Quarterly
- INTF Twice a year
Distribution history
IMFL vs INTF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMFL
- INTF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMFL 13.1%INTF 11.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IMFL 1.04INTF 1.45, better
- Worst fall
- IMFL −31.5%INTF −27.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IMFL 0.86INTF 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.34% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.