Skip to content

FDEV vs MFDX

Fidelity International Multifactor ETF

FDEVACboe

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF

MFDXCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FDEV −0.21pt a year

FDEV0.18%MFDX0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

FDEV 2.1×the volume

FDEV29.3KMFDX14K

5Y return · a year

MFDX +2.1pt

FDEV+7.8%MFDX+9.9%

FDEV vs MFDX Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+45.8%FDEV+60.1%MFDX

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FDEV +45.8%. MFDX +60.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FDEV 0.18%, better
MFDX 0.39%
Fund size
FDEV $276M
MFDX $454M
1Y total return
FDEV +16.6%, better
MFDX +13.6%
Yield (12M)
FDEV 3.27%, better
MFDX 3.01%
Holdings
FDEV 210
MFDX 1303
Avg volume (30D)
FDEV 29.3K sh, better
MFDX 14K sh
NAV per share
FDEV $37.31
MFDX $41.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FDEV: Cost 91, Risk 78, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 48, Durability 42. MFDX: Cost 33, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings 100, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for FDEV, MFDX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFDEVMFDX
Cost30% weightA91HigherD33
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA78HigherB55
Tradability15% weightB59HigherD29
Holdings10% weightC48A100Higher
Durability5% weightC42B55Higher

Rank among International Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FDEV and MFDX are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

International Multifactor⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

FDEV ranks 4th and MFDX 16th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AINTFiShares International Equity Factor ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2ADFAIDimensional International Core Equity Market ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3AGSWOGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 4AFDEVFidelity International Multifactor ETFScore 73
  5. Rank 5ARODMHartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETFScore 71
  6. Rank 16CJPINJPMorgan Diversified Return International Equity ETFScore 47
  7. Rank 16CMFDXPIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETFScore 47
  8. Rank 16CUIVMVictoryShares International Value Momentum ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FDEVAFidelity International Multifactor ETF

MFDXCPIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF

In short

FDEV Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one developed-markets index fund at 0.18% a year. Fidelity's answer to paying up for a single-factor tilt overseas.

MFDX PIMCO's answer to the plain international index fund: one Research Affiliates multi-factor benchmark covering roughly 1,200 developed-market stocks outside the US, in a single ticker instead of four style funds bolted together.

Stated mandate

FDEV The fund seeks returns generally corresponding to the Fidelity International Multifactor Index before fees and expenses.

MFDX The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index.

Why people hold it

  • FDEV 0.18% a year, less than half the typical fee in its international multifactor group, and within a rounding error of the cheapest name there (INTF at 0.16%).
  • One index does the work of four screens: value, quality, momentum and low volatility applied together, instead of you stacking separate single-factor funds.
  • Roughly 220 developed-market stocks outside the US, picked by published index rules rather than a manager's hunches, with cash paid out quarterly.
  • Sits in the top quartile of a 29-fund international factor cohort, which is a crowded field full of far pricier attempts at the same job.
  • MFDX Breadth is the standout. Roughly 1,200 developed-market names outside the US, one of the most broadly diversified portfolios in its multi-factor peer group.
  • One wrapper, several factors. The RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index is the only benchmark, so the factor mix arrives without stacking separate style ETFs.
  • Live since 2017, giving it a real multi-year record through several market moods rather than a backtest and a launch party.
  • Distributions land quarterly, the standard rhythm for developed-market equity funds.

Worth knowing

  • FDEV Thinly traded. Spreads can quietly cost more than the fee, so limit orders matter more here than with the category's household names.
  • A 2019 launch still in the mid-size asset range, so there is no decades-long record to lean on the way older international index funds offer.
  • Blending four factors means none of them drives the bus. When value or momentum alone runs hot, this owns only a slice of that move.
  • MFDX At 0.40% a year it runs slightly above the typical fund in this cohort, and noticeably above cheaper rivals like INTF at 0.16% and GSIE at 0.25%.
  • It trades thinly next to the category's household names, which is where limit orders and avoiding the opening bell earn their keep.
  • Factor tilts mean the portfolio can look and behave differently from a plain developed-markets tracker, in either direction.

Full FDEV profile⁠

Full MFDX profile⁠

FDEV vs MFDX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FDEV vs MFDX Cost

Overpaying MFDX vs FDEV

$4,149

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FDEV 0.18%

    $3,749

  • MFDX 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FDEV 0.18%
  • MFDX 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530MFDX $7,898FDEV $3,749

Year by year

YearFDEVMFDXOverpaying
10$328$705$377
20$1,281$2,725$1,444
30$3,749$7,898$4,149

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%FDEV, cheaper
  • 0.39%MFDX
  • Middle half of International Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.34%

FDEV 3rd cheapest of 30 funds

MFDX 20th cheapest of 30 funds

FDEV vs MFDX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FDEV 3.27%, better
MFDX 3.01%
Payout (12M)
FDEV $1.22
MFDX $1.23
Last payment
FDEV $0.33
MFDX $0.23
Ex-dividend
FDEV Sep 18, 2026
MFDX Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
FDEV Sep 22, 2026
MFDX Oct 5, 2026
Frequency
FDEV Quarterly
MFDX Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FDEVQuarterly · 31 paymentsAll FDEV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 31 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 15, 2019 $0.13; Jun 21, 2019 $0.27; Sep 20, 2019 $0.14; Dec 20, 2019 $0.19; Mar 20, 2020 $0.15; Jun 19, 2020 $0.17; Sep 18, 2020 $0.16; Dec 18, 2020 $0.04; Mar 19, 2021 $0.16; Jun 18, 2021 $0.23; Sep 17, 2021 $0.16; Dec 17, 2021 $0.29; Mar 18, 2022 $0.20; Jun 17, 2022 $0.20; Sep 16, 2022 $0.19; Dec 16, 2022 $0.06; Mar 17, 2023 $0.21; Jun 16, 2023 $0.23; Sep 15, 2023 $0.18; Dec 15, 2023 $0.12; Mar 15, 2024 $0.22; Jun 21, 2024 $0.27; Sep 20, 2024 $0.20; Dec 20, 2024 $0.14; Mar 21, 2025 $0.23; Jun 20, 2025 $0.29; Sep 19, 2025 $0.21; Dec 19, 2025 $0.26; Mar 20, 2026 $0.25; Jun 18, 2026 $0.38; Sep 18, 2026 $0.33. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
MFDXQuarterly · 35 paymentsAll MFDX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 35 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.19; Jul 2, 2018 $0.25; Oct 1, 2018 $0.23; Dec 28, 2018 $0.19; Apr 1, 2019 $0.09; Jul 1, 2019 $0.22; Oct 1, 2019 $0.16; Dec 30, 2019 $0.28; Apr 1, 2020 $0.11; Jul 1, 2020 $0.13; Oct 1, 2020 $0.03; Dec 30, 2020 $0.16; Apr 1, 2021 $0.10; Jul 1, 2021 $0.24; Oct 1, 2021 $0.13; Dec 30, 2021 $0.41; Apr 1, 2022 $0.10; Jul 1, 2022 $0.31; Oct 3, 2022 $0.11; Dec 29, 2022 $0.21; Apr 3, 2023 $0.18; Jul 3, 2023 $0.35; Oct 2, 2023 $0.20; Dec 28, 2023 $0.18; Apr 1, 2024 $0.13; Jul 1, 2024 $0.40; Oct 1, 2024 $0.25; Dec 31, 2024 $0.15; Apr 1, 2025 $0.22; Jul 1, 2025 $0.38; Oct 1, 2025 $0.21; Dec 31, 2025 $0.33; Apr 1, 2026 $0.25; Jul 1, 2026 $0.42; Oct 1, 2026 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FDEV vs MFDX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FDEV
  • MFDX
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FDEV −27.9% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FDEV 10.5%, betterMFDX 11.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FDEV 1.31, betterMFDX 1.24
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FDEV −27.9%MFDX −25.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FDEV 0.65MFDX 0.81

Popular comparisons

  • FDEVAvsINTFA

    Fidelity International Multifactor ETF · iShares International Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.16%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MFDXCvsINTFA

    PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF · iShares International Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.16%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDEVAvsDFAIA

    Fidelity International Multifactor ETF · Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MFDXCvsDFAIA

    PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF · Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDEVAvsGSWOA

    Fidelity International Multifactor ETF · Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MFDXCvsGSWOA

    PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF · Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.