INTF ranks 1st and MFDX 16th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
INTF vs MFDX
INTF −0.23pt a year
0.16%0.39%
INTF 22.0×the volume
309K14K
INTF +0.7pt
+10.6%+9.9%
INTF vs MFDX Performance
+65.8%+60.1%
- INTF 0.16%, better
- MFDX 0.39%
- INTF $3.7B
- MFDX $454M
- INTF +17.0%, better
- MFDX +13.6%
- INTF 3.02%, better
- MFDX 3.01%
- INTF 501
- MFDX 1303
- INTF 309K sh, better
- MFDX 14K sh
- INTF $41.10
- MFDX $41.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INTF | MFDX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | D33 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55 | B55 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | B68 | A100Higher |
| Durability | A86Higher | B55 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. INTF and MFDX are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INTFA
MFDXC
In short
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
MFDX PIMCO's answer to the plain international index fund: one Research Affiliates multi-factor benchmark covering roughly 1,200 developed-market stocks outside the US, in a single ticker instead of four style funds bolted together.
Stated mandate
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
MFDX The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INTF vs MFDX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INTF vs MFDX Cost
Overpaying MFDX vs INTF
$4,556
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
MFDX 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INTF | MFDX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $705 | $413 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $2,725 | $1,584 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $7,898 | $4,556 |
- 0.16%INTF, cheaper
- 0.39%MFDX
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
MFDX 20th cheapest of 30 funds
INTF vs MFDX Dividends
- INTF 3.02%, better
- MFDX 3.01%
- INTF $1.24
- MFDX $1.23
- INTF $0.72
- MFDX $0.23
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- MFDX Oct 1, 2026
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- MFDX Oct 5, 2026
- INTF Twice a year
- MFDX Quarterly
Distribution history
INTF vs MFDX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- INTF
- MFDX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INTF 11.2%, betterMFDX 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- INTF 1.45, betterMFDX 1.24
- Worst fall
- INTF −27.6%MFDX −25.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- INTF 0.74MFDX 0.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.