FDEV ranks 4th and QWLD 12th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
FDEV vs QWLD
FDEV −0.12pt a year
0.18%0.30%
FDEV 18.0×the volume
29.3K1.63K
QWLD +2.1pt
+7.8%+9.9%
FDEV vs QWLD Performance
+45.8%+60.3%
- FDEV 0.18%, better
- QWLD 0.30%
- FDEV $276M
- QWLD $179M
- FDEV +16.6%, better
- QWLD +14.2%
- FDEV 3.27%, better
- QWLD 1.76%
- FDEV 210
- QWLD 1239
- FDEV 29.3K sh, better
- QWLD 1.63K sh
- FDEV $37.31
- QWLD $158.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDEV | QWLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | B59 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | A78 | A80Higher |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | C48 | C51Higher |
| Durability | C42 | B57Higher |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDEV and QWLD are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDEVA
QWLDB
In short
FDEV Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one developed-markets index fund at 0.18% a year. Fidelity's answer to paying up for a single-factor tilt overseas.
QWLD Three factor tilts (value, quality, low volatility) blended into one developed-world index instead of three separate bets. Live since 2014, priced below the typical multifactor peer, and it spans all 23 developed markets rather than an ex-US slice.
Stated mandate
FDEV The fund seeks returns generally corresponding to the Fidelity International Multifactor Index before fees and expenses.
QWLD The fund seeks to track the total return of the MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series Index before fees and expenses. The index combines value, low-volatility, and quality exposures across large- and mid-cap stocks in 23 developed countries.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDEV vs QWLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDEV vs QWLD Cost
Overpaying QWLD vs FDEV
$2,400
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDEV 0.18%
$3,749
QWLD 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDEV | QWLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $545 | $217 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,113 | $832 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $6,149 | $2,400 |
- 0.18%FDEV, cheaper
- 0.30%QWLD
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
FDEV 3rd cheapest of 30 funds
QWLD 12th cheapest of 30 funds
FDEV vs QWLD Dividends
- FDEV 3.27%, better
- QWLD 1.76%
- FDEV $1.22
- QWLD $2.78
- FDEV $0.33
- QWLD $1.34
- FDEV Sep 18, 2026
- QWLD Jun 1, 2026
- FDEV Sep 22, 2026
- QWLD Jun 5, 2026
- FDEV Quarterly
- QWLD Twice a year
Distribution history
FDEV vs QWLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDEV
- QWLD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDEV 10.5%QWLD 9.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FDEV 1.31QWLD 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- FDEV −27.9%QWLD −22.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FDEV 0.65QWLD 0.77
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.