Skip to content

GSWO vs QWLD

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF

GSWOACboe

State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF

QWLDBNYSE Arca

Overlap

50.5%by weight

Expense ratio

GSWO −0.15pt a year

GSWO0.15%QWLD0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

GSWO 39.4×the volume

GSWO64KQWLD1.63K

GSWO vs QWLD Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.5%GSWO+1.8%QWLD

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GSWO +0.5%. QWLD +1.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−1%3%4%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GSWO 0.15%, better
QWLD 0.30%
Fund size
GSWO $1.79B
QWLD $179M
1Y total return
GSWO No data
QWLD +14.2%
Yield (12M)
GSWO 1.46%
QWLD 1.76%, better
Holdings
GSWO 751
QWLD 1239
Avg volume (30D)
GSWO 64K sh, better
QWLD 1.63K sh
NAV per share
GSWO $64.95
QWLD $158.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GSWO: Cost 98, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 86, Holdings 22, Durability 62. QWLD: Cost 59, Risk 80, Mission 81, Tradability 51, Holdings 51, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for GSWO, QWLD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGSWOQWLD
Cost30% weightA98HigherB59
Mission25% weightNot scoredA81
Risk15% weightB67A80Higher
Tradability15% weightA86HigherC51
Holdings10% weightF22C51Higher
Durability5% weightB62HigherB57

Rank among International Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GSWO and QWLD are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

International Multifactor⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

GSWO ranks 3rd and QWLD 12th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AINTFiShares International Equity Factor ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2ADFAIDimensional International Core Equity Market ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3AGSWOGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 4AFDEVFidelity International Multifactor ETFScore 73
  5. Rank 12BDXIVDimensional International Vector Equity ETFScore 60
  6. Rank 12BQWLDState Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETFScore 60
  7. Rank 14CGSEUGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GSWOAGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF

QWLDBState Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF

In short

GSWO Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) on developed markets outside the US, for 15 basis points. Goldman's ActiveBeta rules at a price closer to an index fund than an active one.

QWLD Three factor tilts (value, quality, low volatility) blended into one developed-world index instead of three separate bets. Live since 2014, priced below the typical multifactor peer, and it spans all 23 developed markets rather than an ex-US slice.

Stated mandate

GSWO The fund is an ActiveBeta World Equity ETF designed to track an ActiveBeta Index and provide exposure to value, momentum, quality, and low-volatility characteristics.

QWLD The fund seeks to track the total return of the MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series Index before fees and expenses. The index combines value, low-volatility, and quality exposures across large- and mid-cap stocks in 23 developed countries.

Why people hold it

  • GSWO 0.15% a year against a 0.69% median for its global active-equity peers, and cheaper than fellow top-graded names DFAW (0.24%) and AVGE (0.25%).
  • Value, momentum, quality and low volatility come from one published ActiveBeta index methodology, not a manager's discretionary call.gsam.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in its global equity peer group: a multi-billion-dollar fund in the standard 1940 Act ETF wrapper that pays quarterly.
  • QWLD Costs 0.30% a year against a 0.38% median for its multifactor peer group. Cheap for a strategy that runs three screens at once.
  • The index blends value, quality and low volatility in one wrapper, so no single factor's cold spell drives the whole result. MSCI does the rebalancing; you hold one ticker.ssga.com
  • Well over a thousand large- and mid-cap names across 23 developed countries. Most rivals here carve out the US; this one keeps the whole developed world in the basket.
  • A decade-plus of live history under State Street, with tracking that has stayed tight to the index it advertises. It sits in the upper half of its multifactor cohort.

Worth knowing

  • GSWO Despite the "World" name, the reference index is MSCI World ex USA, so US stocks sit outside the mandate.
  • Launched in 2022, so the live record is short, and factor blends can trail plain cap-weighted benchmarks for long stretches.
  • Four factors in one basket can pull against each other; the net tilt is milder than a single-factor fund.
  • QWLD Thinly traded with a modest asset base, so spreads can run wider than the household-name international funds. Order type and size matter more here.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not quarterly. Income-focused holders get a lumpier cadence.
  • Cheaper multifactor options exist: INTF charges 0.16% and FDEV 0.18%, though both fish in ex-US waters rather than the full developed world.

Full GSWO profile⁠

Full QWLD profile⁠

GSWO vs QWLD Holdings

How GSWO and QWLD differ

Overlap by weight

50.5%

Shared holdings make up 81.0% of GSWO and 70.3% of QWLD.

Level by level

  • Holdings466 in both50.5%
  • Countryby domicile95.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for GSWO.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GSWO and QWLD, widest gap first
CountryMore in GSWOMore in QWLD
United StatesGSWO +2.1 points
SwitzerlandQWLD +1.4 points
FranceQWLD +0.8 points
United KingdomQWLD +0.6 points
NetherlandsQWLD +0.6 points
Other countries (22)GSWO +1.2 points

Outside the US: GSWO 95% developed, 5% emerging. QWLD 98% developed, 2% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GSWO27.5%
  • QWLD17.9%

Securities held

  • GSWO740
  • QWLD1,210

Asset class

GSWO
Equity
QWLD
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GSWO274
  • In both466
  • Only in QWLD744

Only in GSWO

274 securities, 18.7% of GSWO by weight

  • Asml Holding N.v.0.75%
  • Hsbc Holdings PLC0.31%
  • Astrazeneca PLC Ord0.28%

Only in QWLD

744 securities, 29.6% of QWLD by weight

  • Asml Holding NV1.13%
  • Sap SE0.52%
  • Chubb Ltd0.44%

Weight gaps

The 100 widest of 466 Holdings in both funds.

Holding weights in GSWO and QWLD, widest gap first
HoldingMore in GSWOMore in QWLD
NVIDIA CorporationNVDAGSWO +3.35 points
Apple Inc.AAPLGSWO +2.97 points
Amazon.com IncAMZNGSWO +2.10 points
Tesla Inc.TSLAGSWO +1.25 points
Micron Technology, Inc.MUGSWO +1.14 points
Microsoft CorporationMSFTGSWO +1.05 points
Alphabet Inc.GOOGLGSWO +0.96 points
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.AMDGSWO +0.87 points

All 741 GSWO holdings⁠All 1,223 QWLD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GSWO vs QWLD Cost

Overpaying QWLD vs GSWO

$3,012

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GSWO 0.15%

    $3,137

  • QWLD 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GSWO 0.15%
  • QWLD 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530QWLD $6,149GSWO $3,137

Year by year

YearGSWOQWLDOverpaying
10$274$545$271
20$1,071$2,113$1,042
30$3,137$6,149$3,012

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%GSWO, cheaper
  • 0.30%QWLD
  • Middle half of International Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.34%

GSWO cheapest of 30 funds

QWLD 12th cheapest of 30 funds

GSWO vs QWLD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GSWO 1.46%
QWLD 1.76%, better
Payout (12M)
GSWO $0.93
QWLD $2.78
Last payment
GSWO $0.20
QWLD $1.34
Ex-dividend
GSWO Sep 24, 2026
QWLD Jun 1, 2026
Paid on
GSWO Sep 30, 2026
QWLD Jun 5, 2026
Frequency
GSWO Quarterly
QWLD Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GSWOQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll GSWO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2022 $0.31; Sep 26, 2022 $0.16; Dec 27, 2022 $0.20; Mar 27, 2023 $0.17; Jun 26, 2023 $0.31; Sep 25, 2023 $0.16; Dec 26, 2023 $0.26; Mar 22, 2024 $0.15; Jun 24, 2024 $0.32; Sep 24, 2024 $0.18; Dec 23, 2024 $0.21; Mar 25, 2025 $0.16; Jun 24, 2025 $0.37; Sep 24, 2025 $0.24; Dec 23, 2025 $0.23; Mar 25, 2026 $0.19; Jun 24, 2026 $0.32; Sep 24, 2026 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
QWLDTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll QWLD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.83; Dec 15, 2017 $1.22; Jun 1, 2018 $0.63; Dec 21, 2018 $0.97; Jun 3, 2019 $0.83; Dec 20, 2019 $0.99; Jun 1, 2020 $0.85; Dec 18, 2020 $0.78; Jun 1, 2021 $0.92; Dec 17, 2021 $1.03; Jun 1, 2022 $1.00; Dec 16, 2022 $0.89; Jun 1, 2023 $1.02; Dec 15, 2023 $0.94; Jun 3, 2024 $0.97; Dec 18, 2024 $1.19; Jun 2, 2025 $1.21; Nov 25, 2025 $1.43; Jun 1, 2026 $1.34. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

GSWO vs QWLD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GSWO No dataQWLD 9.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GSWO No dataQWLD 1.43
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GSWO No dataQWLD −22.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GSWO 0.75QWLD 0.77

Popular comparisons

  • GSWOAvsINTFA

    Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF · iShares International Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.16%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QWLDBvsINTFA

    State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF · iShares International Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.16%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSWOAvsDFAIA

    Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF · Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QWLDBvsDFAIA

    State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF · Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSWOAvsFDEVA

    Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF · Fidelity International Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QWLDBvsFDEVA

    State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF · Fidelity International Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.