FDFF ranks 1st and IPAY 3rd of 7 funds in the Fintech & Payments Category.
FDFF vs IPAY
FDFF −0.25pt a year
0.50%0.75%
IPAY 15.0×the volume
4.25K63.9K
FDFF +3.6pt
+15.2%+11.6%
FDFF vs IPAY Performance
+2.3%−8.9%
- FDFF 0.50%, better
- IPAY 0.75%
- FDFF $43M
- IPAY $147M
- FDFF +2.3%, better
- IPAY −8.9%
- FDFF 0.99%, better
- IPAY 0.84%
- FDFF 51
- IPAY 41
- FDFF 4.25K sh
- IPAY 63.9K sh, better
- FDFF $35.51
- IPAY $49.12
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDFF | IPAY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B64Higher | F17 |
| Mission | A77 | |
| Risk | A71Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | C40 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | B64Higher | C52 |
| Durability | B57 | A74Higher |
Rank among Fintech & Payments funds
Same Category. FDFF and IPAY are both graded against the same 7 Fintech & Payments funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDFFB
IPAYC
In short
FDFF Fidelity's stock-picker take on fintech: roughly 50 hand-chosen names in payments, lending and financial software, at the lowest fee in its fintech peer group. Small and thinly traded, but the mandate is clear and the price tag is light.
IPAY The payments purist. IPAY tracks a global index of card networks, processors and wallet apps, roughly 40 names deep, while most fintech funds spread into lending, crypto and banking software.
Stated mandate
FDFF The fund seeks long-term growth of capital and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in securities of disruptive finance companies.
IPAY IPAY seeks returns that generally track the Nasdaq CTA Global Digital Payments Index before fees and expenses. It follows a passive/indexing approach rather than trying to outperform the index or moving temporarily defensive.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDFF vs IPAY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDFF vs IPAY Cost
Overpaying IPAY vs FDFF
$4,503
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDFF 0.50%
$9,979
IPAY 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDFF | IPAY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,336 | $436 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,078 | $1,618 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $14,482 | $4,503 |
- 0.50%FDFF, cheaper
- 0.75%IPAY
- Middle half of Fintech & Payments funds
- Median 0.55%
FDFF 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
IPAY 6th cheapest of 7 funds
FDFF vs IPAY Dividends
- FDFF 0.99%, better
- IPAY 0.84%
- FDFF $0.35
- IPAY $0.41
- FDFF $0.06
- IPAY $0.41
- FDFF Sep 18, 2026
- IPAY Dec 30, 2025
- FDFF Sep 22, 2026
- IPAY Dec 31, 2025
- FDFF Quarterly
- IPAY Annual
Distribution history
FDFF vs IPAY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDFF 20.3%, betterIPAY 23.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDFF 0.58, betterIPAY 0.39
- Worst fall
- FDFF −23.1%IPAY −46.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FDFF 1.15IPAY 1.39
FDFF and IPAY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
