FDIG ranks 1st and STBQ 13th of 20 funds in the Crypto Industry Stocks Category.
FDIG vs STBQ
FDIG −0.30pt a year
0.39%0.69%
FDIG 11.7×the volume
28K2.4K
FDIG vs STBQ Performance
−12.4%−18.2%
- FDIG 0.39%, better
- STBQ 0.69%
- FDIG $195M
- STBQ $2M
- FDIG −30.1%
- STBQ
- FDIG 1.87%
- STBQ
- FDIG 71
- STBQ 29
- FDIG 28K sh, better
- STBQ 2.4K sh
- FDIG $33.53
- STBQ $20.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDIG | STBQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | D34 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B57 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | A73Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | A83Higher | A74 |
| Durability | A70Higher | D29 |
Rank among Crypto Industry Stocks funds
Same Category. FDIG and STBQ are both graded against the same 20 Crypto Industry Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDIGA
STBQC
In short
FDIG Crypto exposure through the companies, not the coins: roughly 50 miners, exchanges and digital payments processors, weighted by how heavily they trade rather than how big they are, in a Fidelity-built index priced below the thematic norm.
STBQ Most crypto-equity funds chase miners or blockchain generalists. STBQ narrows in on stablecoin plumbing: the issuers, payment rails and wallet tech behind digital dollars, plus a sleeve of digital asset ETPs, in one concentrated basket.
Stated mandate
FDIG The fund seeks to track the performance of the Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index before fees and expenses. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities or depositary receipts included in that index.
STBQ The fund seeks to track the MarketVectorTM Stablecoin Technology Leaders Index, which targets companies involved in stablecoin technology and infrastructure, along with digital asset exchange-traded products.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDIG vs STBQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDIG vs STBQ Cost
Overpaying STBQ vs FDIG
$5,531
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDIG 0.39%
$7,898
STBQ 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDIG | STBQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,232 | $527 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,697 | $1,972 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $13,429 | $5,531 |
- 0.39%FDIG, cheaper
- 0.69%STBQ
- Middle half of Crypto Industry Stocks funds
- Median 0.66%
FDIG 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
STBQ 13th cheapest of 20 funds
FDIG vs STBQ Dividends
- FDIG 1.87%
- STBQ
- FDIG $0.63
- STBQ None
- FDIG $0.02
- STBQ
- FDIG Sep 18, 2026
- STBQ
- FDIG Sep 22, 2026
- STBQ
- FDIG Quarterly
- STBQ
Distribution history
FDIG vs STBQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDIG 57.6%STBQ
- Return per unit of risk
- FDIG 0.65STBQ
- Worst fall
- FDIG −58.3%STBQ
- Market sensitivity
- FDIG 3.05STBQ 1.00
FDIG and STBQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

