LEGR ranks 3rd and STBQ 13th of 20 funds in the Crypto Industry Stocks Category.
LEGR vs STBQ
3.1%by weight
LEGR −0.04pt a year
0.65%0.69%
LEGR 1.1×the volume
2.75K2.4K
LEGR vs STBQ Performance
+12.4%−18.2%
- LEGR 0.65%, better
- STBQ 0.69%
- LEGR $124M
- STBQ $2M
- LEGR +16.8%
- STBQ
- LEGR 1.83%
- STBQ
- LEGR 110
- STBQ 29
- LEGR 2.75K sh, better
- STBQ 2.4K sh
- LEGR $65.02
- STBQ $20.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LEGR | STBQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55Higher | D34 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A90Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | D39Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | A74 |
| Durability | A79Higher | D29 |
Rank among Crypto Industry Stocks funds
Same Category. LEGR and STBQ are both graded against the same 20 Crypto Industry Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LEGRB
STBQC
In short
LEGR Blockchain, hold the coins. LEGR has tracked the Indxx Blockchain Index since January 2018, owning roughly 110 global companies that build with the technology or stand to benefit from it, rather than the tokens themselves.
STBQ Most crypto-equity funds chase miners or blockchain generalists. STBQ narrows in on stablecoin plumbing: the issuers, payment rails and wallet tech behind digital dollars, plus a sleeve of digital asset ETPs, in one concentrated basket.
Stated mandate
LEGR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Indxx Blockchain Index before fees and expenses. The index targets companies involved with blockchain technology or positioned to benefit from its use in business processes.
STBQ The fund seeks to track the MarketVectorTM Stablecoin Technology Leaders Index, which targets companies involved in stablecoin technology and infrastructure, along with digital asset exchange-traded products.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LEGR vs STBQ Holdings
How LEGR and STBQ differ
3.1%
Shared holdings make up 14.4% of STBQ and 3.1% of LEGR.
Level by level
- Holdings3.1%
- Country42.4%
- Sector79.3%
Sector
| Sector | More in LEGRMore in STBQ | Gap | LEGR | STBQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | STBQ +11.5 points | 21.1% | 32.6% | |
| Financials | STBQ +9.2 points | 49.8% | 59.0% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | LEGR +7.2 points | 7.2% | 0.0% | |
| Communication | LEGR +4.8 points | 8.4% | 3.6% | |
| Utilities | LEGR +3.0 points | 3.0% | 0.0% | |
| Materials | LEGR +2.0 points | 2.0% | 0.0% | |
| Industrials | LEGR +1.4 points | 6.2% | 4.8% | |
| Consumer Staples | LEGR +1.4 points | 1.4% | 0.0% | |
| Energy | LEGR +1.0 points | 1.0% | 0.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in LEGRMore in STBQ | Gap | LEGR | STBQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | STBQ +44.6 points | 41.5% | 86.1% | |
| China | LEGR +13.7 points | 13.7% | 0.0% | |
| Germany | LEGR +6.9 points | 6.9% | 0.0% | |
| United Kingdom | LEGR +5.9 points | 5.9% | 0.0% | |
| Brazil | STBQ +5.3 points | 0.0% | 5.3% | |
| Australia | LEGR +4.9 points | 4.9% | 0.0% | |
| India | LEGR +4.6 points | 4.6% | 0.0% | |
| Israel | STBQ +4.3 points | 0.0% | 4.3% | |
| Other countries (13) | LEGR +18.2 points | 22.5% | 4.3% |
Outside the US: LEGR 66% developed, 34% emerging.
Concentration
- LEGR13.3%
- STBQ53.3%
- LEGR100
- STBQ28
Asset class
- LEGR
- Stocks
- STBQ
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in LEGR97
- In both3
- Only in STBQ25
Only in LEGR
97 securities, 96.4% of LEGR by weight
- Walmart Inc.1.41%
- HDFC Bank Ltd. (ADR)1.37%
- S&P Global Inc.1.36%
- The Home Depot, Inc.1.34%
- CME Group Inc.1.33%
- BlackRock, Inc.1.32%
- Accenture plc1.31%
- Iberdrola S.A.1.29%
- Bank of Communications Co., Ltd. (Class H)1.28%
- Lockheed Martin Corporation1.27%
- Anz Group Holdings Ltd1.25%
- Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. (Class H)1.25%
- Westpac Banking Corporation1.25%
- Commonwealth Bank of Australia1.24%
- Workday, Inc. (Class A)1.24%
- AIA Group Limited1.24%
- China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. (Class H)1.24%
- Bank of China Ltd.1.22%
- The Toronto-Dominion Bank1.21%
- MetLife, Inc.1.21%
- American Express Company1.19%
- Axa S.a.1.19%
- Tesla, Inc.1.17%
- Allianz SE1.17%
- Royal Bank of Canada1.16%
- First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC1.16%
- Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. (Class H)1.15%
- BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Limited1.15%
- Airbus SE1.14%
- Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A)1.13%
- Ford Motor Company1.07%
- Shopify Inc. (Class A)1.06%
- Nordea Bank Abp1.05%
- ICICI Bank Limited (ADR)1.05%
- Cisco Systems, Inc.1.04%
- BHP Group Limited1.03%
- ING Groep N.V. (ADR)1.03%
- Sony Group Corp. (ADR)1.03%
- Infosys Limited (ADR)1.03%
- Tata Consultancy Services Limited1.03%
- Lloyds Banking Group Plc (ADR)1.03%
- Sap SE1.02%
- Barclays Plc1.02%
- Morgan Stanley1.02%
- Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (ADR)1.01%
- Mercedes-Benz Group AG1.01%
- The Boeing Company1.01%
- Rio Tinto plc (ADR)1.00%
- Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation1.00%
- Swisscom AG0.99%
Only in STBQ
25 securities, 85.5% of STBQ by weight
- Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF6.22%
- iShares Ethereum Trust ETF6.16%
- Bitwise Solana Staking ETF6.03%
- Bitwise XRP ETF5.69%
- Flywire Corp5.19%
- Marqeta Inc4.99%
- Block Inc4.62%
- Shift4 Payments Inc4.54%
- GPGI Inc4.53%
- Dlocal Ltd/Uruguay4.06%
- SoFi Technologies Inc3.99%
- Stablecoinx Inc3.79%
- Coinbase Global Inc3.28%
- Etoro Group Ltd3.20%
- Circle Internet Group Inc3.10%
- Opera Ltd2.54%
- Figure Technology Solutions Inc2.54%
- Bitgo Holdings Inc2.40%
- Galaxy Digital Inc2.32%
- Bakkt Inc2.22%
- Gemini Space Station Inc2.06%
- 21Shares Canton Network ETF0.68%
- OSL Group Ltd0.66%
- Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12/31/20310.59%
- Exodus Movement Inc0.16%
Weight gaps
All 3 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in LEGRMore in STBQ | Gap | LEGR | STBQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visa Inc. (Class A) | STBQ +4.00 points | 1.03% | 5.03% | |
| PayPal Holdings, Inc. | STBQ +3.82 points | 1.00% | 4.82% | |
| Mastercard Incorporated | STBQ +3.49 points | 1.04% | 4.53% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LEGR vs STBQ Cost
Overpaying STBQ vs LEGR
$712
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LEGR 0.65%
$12,717
STBQ 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LEGR | STBQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,232 | $69 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $4,697 | $257 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $13,429 | $712 |
- 0.65%LEGR, cheaper
- 0.69%STBQ
- Middle half of Crypto Industry Stocks funds
- Median 0.66%
LEGR 8th cheapest of 20 funds
STBQ 13th cheapest of 20 funds
LEGR vs STBQ Dividends
- LEGR 1.83%
- STBQ
- LEGR $1.20
- STBQ None
- LEGR $0.18
- STBQ
- LEGR Sep 24, 2026
- STBQ
- LEGR Sep 30, 2026
- STBQ
- LEGR Quarterly
- STBQ
Distribution history
LEGR vs STBQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LEGR 11.7%STBQ
- Return per unit of risk
- LEGR 1.59STBQ
- Worst fall
- LEGR −31.5%STBQ
- Market sensitivity
- LEGR 0.90STBQ 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.