SCZ ranks 4th and FDTS 16th of 16 funds in the International Small-Cap Category.
FDTS vs SCZ
SCZ −0.40pt a year
0.80%0.40%
SCZ 986.2×the volume
1.24K1.23M
FDTS +2.0pt
+10.1%+8.1%
FDTS vs SCZ Performance
+65.2%+25.7%
- FDTS 0.80%
- SCZ 0.40%, better
- FDTS $13M
- SCZ $12.6B
- FDTS +24.4%, better
- SCZ +14.1%
- FDTS 2.73%
- SCZ 3.20%, better
- FDTS 408
- SCZ 2033
- FDTS 1.24K sh
- SCZ 1.23M sh, better
- FDTS $64.65
- SCZ $80.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDTS | SCZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D39 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | F10 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | C43 | A76Higher |
| Durability | D27 | A87Higher |
Rank among International Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FDTS and SCZ are both graded against the same 16 International Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDTSF
SCZA
In short
FDTS Small caps outside the US, picked by rulebook instead of size: FDTS ranks developed-market small companies on growth and value marks, then holds roughly 400 of them. It has run this way since 2012.
SCZ The purist's take on foreign small caps: developed markets only, outside the US and Canada. Trading since 2007, SCZ follows the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, so Japan, Europe and Australia are in and emerging markets stay out.
Stated mandate
FDTS The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® Developed Markets Ex-US Small CapTM Index.
SCZ The fund seeks to track an index of small-cap equities from developed markets outside the United States and Canada, providing international diversification and exposure to overseas small-cap stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDTS vs SCZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDTS vs SCZ Cost
Overpaying FDTS vs SCZ
$7,256
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDTS 0.80%
$15,346
SCZ 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDTS | SCZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $723 | $699 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $2,793 | $2,600 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $8,090 | $7,256 |
- 0.80%FDTS
- 0.40%SCZ, cheaper
- Middle half of International Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.44%
SCZ 6th cheapest of 16 funds
FDTS 15th cheapest of 16 funds
FDTS vs SCZ Dividends
- FDTS 2.73%
- SCZ 3.20%, better
- FDTS $1.82
- SCZ $2.67
- FDTS $0.28
- SCZ $1.17
- FDTS Sep 24, 2026
- SCZ Jun 15, 2026
- FDTS Sep 30, 2026
- SCZ Jun 18, 2026
- FDTS Quarterly
- SCZ Twice a year
Distribution history
FDTS vs SCZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDTS
- SCZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDTS 16.7%SCZ 13.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FDTS 1.20, betterSCZ 1.04
- Worst fall
- FDTS −30.6%, betterSCZ −35.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FDTS 1.02SCZ 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.