Skip to content
etf.net

FEBM vs PMJL

FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - February

FEBMCCboe

PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July

PMJLBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PMJL −0.35pt a year

FEBM0.85%PMJL0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

PMJL 1.1×the volume

FEBM2.1KPMJL2.33K

FEBM vs PMJL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+5.7%FEBM+5.3%PMJL

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. FEBM +5.7%. PMJL +5.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%3%4%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FEBM 0.85%
PMJL 0.50%, better
Fund size
FEBM $46M
PMJL $7M
1Y total return
FEBM +5.7%, better
PMJL +5.3%
Holdings
FEBM 3
PMJL 4
Avg volume (30D)
FEBM 2.1K sh
PMJL 2.33K sh, better
NAV per share
FEBM $31.78
PMJL $26.99
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEBM: Cost 21, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 57, Holdings not scored, Durability 69. PMJL: Cost 76, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings not scored, Durability 27.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEBM, PMJL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEBMPMJL
Cost30% weightF21A76Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51HigherC45
Tradability15% weightB57HigherD37
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB69HigherD27

Rank among S&P 500 Max Buffer funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEBM and PMJL are both graded against the same 20 S&P 500 Max Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Max Buffer⁠

Category · 20 funds
See all 20 ›

PMJL ranks 2nd and FEBM 15th of 20 funds in the S&P 500 Max Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BPMDEPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPMJLPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - JulyScore 56
  3. Rank 2BPMSEPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 56
  4. Rank 14CJUNMFT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - JuneScore 43
  5. Rank 15CFEBMFT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 40
  6. Rank 15CPMAPPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - AprilScore 40

FEBM vs PMJL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEBM vs PMJL Cost

Overpaying FEBM vs PMJL

$6,220

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEBM 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PMJL 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEBM 0.85%
  • PMJL 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FEBM $16,199PMJL $9,979

Year by year

YearFEBMPMJLOverpaying
10$1,508$900$608
20$5,706$3,460$2,246
30$16,199$9,979$6,220

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FEBM
  • 0.50%PMJL, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Max Buffer funds
  • Median 0.52%

PMJL cheapest of 20 funds

FEBM 12th cheapest of 20 funds

FEBM vs PMJL Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
FEBM None
PMJL None

Distribution history

FEBMAll FEBM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PMJLAll PMJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FEBM vs PMJL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FEBM 2.4%since Mar 2025PMJL 1.9%since Aug 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FEBM 0.88since Mar 2025PMJL 0.98since Aug 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FEBM −2.6%since Feb 2025PMJL −1.5%since Jul 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEBM 0.17PMJL 0.15

Popular comparisons

  • FEBMCvsPMDEB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - February · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PMJLBvsPMDEB

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FEBMCvsPMSEB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - February · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PMJLBvsPMSEB

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FEBMCvsPMJNB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - February · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PMJLBvsPMJNB

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.