PSFD ranks 2nd and FEBW 18th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
FEBW vs PSFD
0.0%by weight
PSFD −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
FEBW 10.1×the volume
9.11K905
PSFD +4.3pt
+12.0%+16.3%
FEBW vs PSFD Performance
+8.8%+11.4%
- FEBW 0.74%
- PSFD 0.49%, better
- FEBW $204M
- PSFD $60M
- FEBW +8.8%
- PSFD +11.4%, better
- FEBW 0.00%
- PSFD
- FEBW 2
- PSFD 4
- FEBW 9.11K sh, better
- PSFD 905 sh
- FEBW $36.58
- PSFD $40.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEBW | PSFD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | C47Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | C54 | |
| Durability | C54 | B69Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. FEBW and PSFD are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEBWC
PSFDB
In short
FEBW Deep-buffer S&P 500 exposure on a February clock: FLEX options absorb the first 20% of a year's losses, and a ceiling on the upside pays for that cushion. Priced at the category median, one rung in AllianzIM's monthly ladder.
PSFD Absorbs the first 20% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each 12-month period, with your upside capped in exchange. One of the original 2020 Pacer/Swan buffer funds, and priced under most deep-buffer rivals.
Stated mandate
FEBW The Fund seeks to provide a buffer against the first 20% of losses of its underlying ETF during the applicable outcome period, using FLEX Options that reference the underlying ETF.
PSFD The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while mitigating specified downside losses through a structured buffer strategy over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEBW vs PSFD Holdings
How FEBW and PSFD differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of FEBW and 0.0% of PSFD.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in FEBWMore in PSFD | FEBW | PSFD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FEBWMore in PSFD | FEBW | PSFD |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- FEBW104.1%
- PSFD102.6%
- FEBW2
- PSFD3
Asset class
- FEBW
- Equity
- PSFD
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in FEBW2
- In both0
- Only in PSFD3
Only in FEBW
2 securities, 100% of FEBW by weight
- Spy 01/29/2027 5.19 C103.34%
- Spy 01/29/2027 692.04 P0.78%
Only in PSFD
3 securities, 100% of PSFD by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 7.64 C101.88%
- Spy 12/31/2026 681.92 P0.45%
- Spy 12/31/2026 409.15 P0.03%
Weight gaps
FEBW and PSFD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEBW vs PSFD Cost
Overpaying FEBW vs PSFD
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEBW 0.74%
$14,307
PSFD 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEBW | PSFD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%FEBW
- 0.49%PSFD, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFD cheapest of 24 funds
FEBW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
FEBW vs PSFD Dividends
- FEBW 0.00%
- PSFD
- FEBW None
- PSFD None
Distribution history
FEBW vs PSFD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEBW 5.1%, betterPSFD 7.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- FEBW 1.39PSFD 1.50, better
- Worst fall
- FEBW −8.8%PSFD −14.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FEBW 0.40PSFD 0.56
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.