Skip to content

FEBZ vs XTR

TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF

FEBZDCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

XTR −0.54pt a year

FEBZ0.79%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

FEBZ 1.6×the volume

FEBZ2.61KXTR1.64K

5Y return · a year

FEBZ +0.8pt

FEBZ+8.8%XTR+8.0%

FEBZ vs XTR Performance

Nov 5, 2021 – Nov 5, 2026

+52.4%FEBZ+47.0%XTR

Nov 5, 2021 to Nov 5, 2026. FEBZ +52.4%. XTR +47.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FEBZ 0.79%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
FEBZ $32M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
FEBZ +5.6%
XTR +6.1%, better
Yield (12M)
FEBZ 3.04%
XTR 16.85%, better
Holdings
FEBZ 16
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
FEBZ 2.61K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
FEBZ $40.92
XTR $28.87
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEBZ: Cost 40, Risk 27, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings not scored, Durability 30. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 19, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 90, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEBZ, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEBZXTR
Cost30% weightC40A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD27HigherF19
Tradability15% weightD37HigherF13
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA90
Durability5% weightD30C46Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEBZ and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

XTR ranks 58th and FEBZ 70th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 58CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  2. Rank 58CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  3. Rank 64DFHDGFT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 39
  4. Rank 70DDGOCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - OctoberScore 35
  5. Rank 70DFEBZTrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETFScore 35
  6. Rank 72DAUGZTrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FEBZDTrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

FEBZ Most buffer ETFs sell you downside protection and quietly take your upside in return. FEBZ skips the cap: it aims to absorb the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 price losses over a 12-month stretch with no ceiling bolted onto the gains.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

FEBZ FEBZ seeks pre-fee, pre-expense returns tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index while protecting against the first 8%-12% of index losses over a 12-month period.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • FEBZ No upside cap. Where most buffered funds hard-stop your gains at a set number, this one keeps participating as the index climbs.true-shares.comtrue-shares.com 2
  • Actively managed options on the S&P 500 Price Index, aiming to buffer the first 8% to 12% of index losses over a 12-month period that resets each February.true-shares.com
  • Running since 2021, part of the original uncapped buffered series rather than a me-too launch chasing the outcome-ETF boom.true-shares.com
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • FEBZ Uncapped is not full upside. The issuer states the participation rate is expected to land below 100% of the market move, and it is reset with each period.true-shares.com
  • The buffer is a range (8% to 12%), set at each reset and measured from the period's starting level, so buying mid-period can mean less cushion than the label suggests.true-shares.com
  • Fee sits at the category median, and this is a small, lightly traded fund. Laddered rival BUFB runs 0.10%, so the uncapped design is what you are paying up for.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full FEBZ profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

FEBZ vs XTR Holdings

How FEBZ and XTR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors96.9%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile99.5%

Sector

Sector weights in FEBZ and XTR, widest gap first
SectorMore in FEBZMore in XTRGap
TechnologyXTR +2.6 points
IndustrialsFEBZ +0.9 points
Consumer DiscretionaryFEBZ +0.9 points
FinancialsFEBZ +0.5 points
EnergyXTR +0.4 points
UtilitiesFEBZ +0.4 points
Consumer StaplesFEBZ +0.3 points
Real EstateFEBZ +0.2 points
Health CareXTR +0.1 points
MaterialsFEBZ +0.1 points
CommunicationSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FEBZ and XTR, widest gap first
CountryMore in FEBZMore in XTRGap
United StatesFEBZ +0.5 points
SwitzerlandXTR +0.3 points
ChinaXTR +0.1 points
MexicoXTR +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FEBZ100.2%
  • XTR37.5%

Securities held

  • FEBZ3
  • XTR505

Asset class

FEBZ
Stocks
XTR
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in FEBZ3
  • In both0
  • Only in XTR505

Only in FEBZ

3 securities, 92.6% of FEBZ by weight

  • Treasury Bill B 01/21/2792.42%
  • Broker Sweep0.10%
  • State Street Inst U.s. Government Mmkt Admn Class0.09%

Only in XTR

505 securities, 99.9% of XTR by weight

  • Apple Inc7.68%
  • NVIDIA Corp7.29%
  • Microsoft Corp6.20%

Weight gaps

FEBZ and XTR share no securities.

All 17 FEBZ holdings⁠All 504 XTR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEBZ vs XTR Cost

Overpaying FEBZ vs XTR

$10,015

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEBZ 0.79%

    $15,174

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEBZ 0.79%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FEBZ $15,174XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearFEBZXTROverpaying
10$1,405$455$950
20$5,331$1,769$3,562
30$15,174$5,159$10,015

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%FEBZ
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

FEBZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds

FEBZ vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Yield (12M)
FEBZ 3.04%
XTR 16.85%, better
Payout (12M)
FEBZ $1.20
XTR $4.69
Last payment
FEBZ $1.20
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
FEBZ Dec 24, 2025
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
FEBZ Dec 26, 2025
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
FEBZ Annual
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

FEBZAnnual · 3 paymentsAll FEBZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $2.08; Dec 27, 2024 $1.33; Dec 24, 2025 $1.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD
XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

FEBZ vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FEBZ
  • XTR
Nov 5, 2021 to Nov 5, 2026. Worst fall: XTR −20.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FEBZ 9.1%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FEBZ 1.20, betterXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FEBZ −17.5%, betterXTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEBZ 0.72XTR 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • FEBZDvsZALTA

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEBZDvsSIXJB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsSIXJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEBZDvsAUGPB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.