QEMM ranks 4th and FEM 12th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
FEM vs QEMM
QEMM −0.50pt a year
0.80%0.30%
FEM 25.9×the volume
99.6K3.85K
FEM +0.8pt
+7.9%+7.1%
FEM vs QEMM Performance
+46.0%+38.9%
- FEM 0.80%
- QEMM 0.30%, better
- FEM $756M
- QEMM $56M
- FEM +17.7%, better
- QEMM +16.5%
- FEM 2.31%
- QEMM 4.66%, better
- FEM 163
- QEMM 836
- FEM 99.6K sh, better
- QEMM 3.85K sh
- FEM $30.94
- QEMM $76.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEM | QEMM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A82Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | B65Higher | B59 |
| Durability | A79Higher | C52 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. FEM and QEMM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEMC
QEMMB
In short
FEM A 2011-vintage take on emerging markets that skips cap-weighting: it ranks stocks on growth and value factors, keeps the top scorers, and weights them in tiers, so the megacap giants don't run the portfolio. The fee sits at the high end.
QEMM Instead of betting on one factor, QEMM buys value, quality and low volatility across emerging markets at once, packing roughly 800 stocks into a single MSCI factor-blend index for 0.30% a year.
Stated mandate
FEM The fund seeks results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Emerging Markets Index. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in index securities and uses indexing to replicate the index.
QEMM The fund seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Factor Mix A-Series Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEM vs QEMM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEM vs QEMM Cost
Overpaying FEM vs QEMM
$9,197
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEM 0.80%
$15,346
QEMM 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEM | QEMM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $545 | $877 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $2,113 | $3,280 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $6,149 | $9,197 |
- 0.80%FEM
- 0.30%QEMM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QEMM 4th cheapest of 20 funds
FEM 19th cheapest of 20 funds
FEM vs QEMM Dividends
- FEM 2.31%
- QEMM 4.66%, better
- FEM $0.72
- QEMM $3.52
- FEM $0.28
- QEMM $1.05
- FEM Sep 24, 2026
- QEMM Jun 1, 2026
- FEM Sep 30, 2026
- QEMM Jun 5, 2026
- FEM Quarterly
- QEMM Twice a year
Distribution history
FEM vs QEMM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FEM
- QEMM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEM 13.7%QEMM 13.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FEM 1.06, betterQEMM 1.00
- Worst fall
- FEM −28.5%QEMM −27.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FEM 0.81QEMM 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.