FEMV ranks 2nd and JMID 14th of 47 funds in the US Active Small/Mid-Cap Category.
FEMV vs JMID
FEMV −0.07pt a year
0.23%0.30%
JMID 2.6×the volume
1.5K3.91K
FEMV vs JMID Performance
+1.9%+0.3%
- FEMV 0.23%, better
- JMID 0.30%
- FEMV $7M
- JMID $22M
- FEMV
- JMID +3.6%
- FEMV
- JMID 0.54%
- FEMV 270
- JMID 94
- FEMV 1.5K sh
- JMID 3.91K sh, better
- FEMV $27.59
- JMID $31.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEMV | JMID |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A91 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A93Higher | D27 |
| Tradability | C47Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | C44 |
| Durability | D35 | C49Higher |
Rank among US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds
Same Category. FEMV and JMID are both graded against the same 47 US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEMVA
JMIDB
In short
FEMV Active mid-cap value, priced like an index fund. FEMV hunts capital appreciation in the Russell Midcap Value corner of the US market for 0.23% a year, a fraction of the typical active US equity ETF fee.
JMID Mid-cap growth run by model, not by gut: Janus Henderson's proprietary factor process picks roughly 80 names against the Russell Midcap Growth Index, priced well under what the typical active US stock ETF charges.
Stated mandate
FEMV The fund seeks capital appreciation and targets the U.S. mid-cap value segment of the equity market.
JMID JMID seeks long-term growth of capital. It is an actively managed mid-cap growth ETF using a systematic, proprietary-factor process that combines quantitative and fundamental methods to pursue alpha and manage risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEMV vs JMID Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEMV vs JMID Cost
Overpaying JMID vs FEMV
$1,390
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEMV 0.23%
$4,759
JMID 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEMV | JMID | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $419 | $545 | $126 |
| 20 | $1,630 | $2,113 | $483 |
| 30 | $4,759 | $6,149 | $1,390 |
- 0.23%FEMV, cheaper
- 0.30%JMID
- Middle half of US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
FEMV 2nd cheapest of 47 funds
JMID 5th cheapest of 47 funds
FEMV vs JMID Dividends
- FEMV
- JMID 0.54%
- FEMV
- JMID $0.16
- FEMV $0.09
- JMID $0.02
- FEMV Sep 18, 2026
- JMID Sep 30, 2026
- FEMV Sep 22, 2026
- JMID Oct 6, 2026
- FEMV Quarterly
- JMID Quarterly
Distribution history
FEMV vs JMID Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEMV JMID 17.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FEMV JMID 0.38
- Worst fall
- FEMV JMID −25.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FEMV −0.05JMID 1.16
FEMV and JMID in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.23% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.