JMEE ranks 4th and JMID 14th of 47 funds in the US Active Small/Mid-Cap Category.
JMEE vs JMID
JMID −0.05pt a year
0.35%0.30%
JMEE 30.8×the volume
121K3.91K
JMEE vs JMID Performance
+19.6%+3.6%
- JMEE 0.35%
- JMID 0.30%, better
- JMEE $2.94B
- JMID $22M
- JMEE +19.6%, better
- JMID +3.6%
- JMEE 0.97%, better
- JMID 0.54%
- JMEE 676
- JMID 94
- JMEE 121K sh, better
- JMID 3.91K sh
- JMEE $74.78
- JMID $31.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JMEE | JMID |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84 | A91Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C50Higher | D27 |
| Tradability | B56Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A88Higher | C44 |
| Durability | A96Higher | C49 |
Rank among US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds
Same Category. JMEE and JMID are both graded against the same 47 US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JMEEA
JMIDB
In short
JMEE Enhanced indexing, not index hugging for its own sake: JMEE keeps sector weights close to the S&P 1000, then lets proprietary stock rankings pick the names. Roughly 700 holdings at 0.35%.
JMID Mid-cap growth run by model, not by gut: Janus Henderson's proprietary factor process picks roughly 80 names against the Russell Midcap Growth Index, priced well under what the typical active US stock ETF charges.
Stated mandate
JMEE The fund seeks returns above the S&P 1000 Index by using proprietary stock rankings and fundamental analysis, while maintaining broadly similar sector weights.
JMID JMID seeks long-term growth of capital. It is an actively managed mid-cap growth ETF using a systematic, proprietary-factor process that combines quantitative and fundamental methods to pursue alpha and manage risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JMEE vs JMID Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JMEE vs JMID Cost
Overpaying JMEE vs JMID
$977
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JMEE 0.35%
$7,126
JMID 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JMEE | JMID | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $545 | $89 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $2,113 | $341 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $6,149 | $977 |
- 0.35%JMEE
- 0.30%JMID, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
JMID 5th cheapest of 47 funds
JMEE 7th cheapest of 47 funds
JMEE vs JMID Dividends
- JMEE 0.97%, better
- JMID 0.54%
- JMEE $0.72
- JMID $0.16
- JMEE $0.72
- JMID $0.02
- JMEE Dec 16, 2025
- JMID Sep 30, 2026
- JMEE Dec 18, 2025
- JMID Oct 6, 2026
- JMEE Annual
- JMID Quarterly
Distribution history
JMEE vs JMID Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JMEE 15.8%JMID 17.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- JMEE 0.90JMID 0.38
- Worst fall
- JMEE −25.4%JMID −25.6%
- Market sensitivity
- JMEE 1.10JMID 1.16
JMEE and JMID in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


