FEMV ranks 2nd and MCDS 8th of 47 funds in the US Active Small/Mid-Cap Category.
FEMV vs MCDS
FEMV −0.12pt a year
0.23%0.35%
FEMV 2.4×the volume
1.5K624
FEMV vs MCDS Performance
+1.9%−0.4%
- FEMV 0.23%, better
- MCDS 0.35%
- FEMV $7M
- MCDS $8M
- FEMV
- MCDS +17.5%
- FEMV
- MCDS 1.02%
- FEMV 270
- MCDS 206
- FEMV 1.5K sh, better
- MCDS 624 sh
- FEMV $27.59
- MCDS $67.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEMV | MCDS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A84 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A93Higher | A73 |
| Tradability | C47Higher | F14 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | A75 |
| Durability | D35 | B59Higher |
Rank among US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds
Same Category. FEMV and MCDS are both graded against the same 47 US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEMVA
MCDSB
In short
FEMV Active mid-cap value, priced like an index fund. FEMV hunts capital appreciation in the Russell Midcap Value corner of the US market for 0.23% a year, a fraction of the typical active US equity ETF fee.
MCDS The mid-cap slice of J.P. Morgan's Fundamental Data Science suite: human analyst research run through a data-science screen, about 200 mid-caps, at roughly half the fee of the median active US equity ETF.
Stated mandate
FEMV The fund seeks capital appreciation and targets the U.S. mid-cap value segment of the equity market.
MCDS The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in mid-cap equity securities. Its approach combines fundamental research, data insights, and risk management to evaluate financial prospects and relative value.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEMV vs MCDS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEMV vs MCDS Cost
Overpaying MCDS vs FEMV
$2,367
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEMV 0.23%
$4,759
MCDS 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEMV | MCDS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $419 | $634 | $215 |
| 20 | $1,630 | $2,454 | $824 |
| 30 | $4,759 | $7,126 | $2,367 |
- 0.23%FEMV, cheaper
- 0.35%MCDS
- Middle half of US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
FEMV 2nd cheapest of 47 funds
MCDS 7th cheapest of 47 funds
FEMV vs MCDS Dividends
- FEMV
- MCDS 1.02%
- FEMV
- MCDS $0.68
- FEMV $0.09
- MCDS $0.19
- FEMV Sep 18, 2026
- MCDS Sep 22, 2026
- FEMV Sep 22, 2026
- MCDS Sep 24, 2026
- FEMV Quarterly
- MCDS Quarterly
Distribution history
FEMV vs MCDS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEMV MCDS 13.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- FEMV MCDS 0.59
- Worst fall
- FEMV MCDS −22.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FEMV −0.05MCDS 0.84
Popular comparisons
- 0.23% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.