JMEE ranks 4th and MCDS 8th of 47 funds in the US Active Small/Mid-Cap Category.
JMEE vs MCDS
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.35%0.35%
JMEE 193.2×the volume
121K624
JMEE vs MCDS Performance
+19.6%+17.5%
- JMEE 0.35%
- MCDS 0.35%
- JMEE $2.94B
- MCDS $8M
- JMEE +19.6%, better
- MCDS +17.5%
- JMEE 0.97%
- MCDS 1.02%, better
- JMEE 676
- MCDS 206
- JMEE 121K sh, better
- MCDS 624 sh
- JMEE $74.78
- MCDS $67.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JMEE | MCDS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84 | A84 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C50 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | B56Higher | F14 |
| Holdings | A88Higher | A75 |
| Durability | A96Higher | B59 |
Rank among US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds
Same Category. JMEE and MCDS are both graded against the same 47 US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JMEEA
MCDSB
In short
JMEE Enhanced indexing, not index hugging for its own sake: JMEE keeps sector weights close to the S&P 1000, then lets proprietary stock rankings pick the names. Roughly 700 holdings at 0.35%.
MCDS The mid-cap slice of J.P. Morgan's Fundamental Data Science suite: human analyst research run through a data-science screen, about 200 mid-caps, at roughly half the fee of the median active US equity ETF.
Stated mandate
JMEE The fund seeks returns above the S&P 1000 Index by using proprietary stock rankings and fundamental analysis, while maintaining broadly similar sector weights.
MCDS The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in mid-cap equity securities. Its approach combines fundamental research, data insights, and risk management to evaluate financial prospects and relative value.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JMEE vs MCDS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JMEE vs MCDS Cost
Same expense ratio
$7,126
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JMEE 0.35%
$7,126
MCDS 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JMEE | MCDS |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $634 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $2,454 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $7,126 |
- 0.35%JMEE
- 0.35%MCDS
- Middle half of US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
JMEE 7th cheapest of 47 funds
MCDS 7th cheapest of 47 funds
JMEE vs MCDS Dividends
- JMEE 0.97%
- MCDS 1.02%, better
- JMEE $0.72
- MCDS $0.68
- JMEE $0.72
- MCDS $0.19
- JMEE Dec 16, 2025
- MCDS Sep 22, 2026
- JMEE Dec 18, 2025
- MCDS Sep 24, 2026
- JMEE Annual
- MCDS Quarterly
Distribution history
JMEE vs MCDS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JMEE 15.8%MCDS 13.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- JMEE 0.90MCDS 0.59
- Worst fall
- JMEE −25.4%MCDS −22.5%
- Market sensitivity
- JMEE 1.10MCDS 0.84
JMEE and MCDS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


