GSWO ranks 3rd and FEP 25th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
FEP vs GSWO
GSWO −0.65pt a year
0.80%0.15%
GSWO 2.6×the volume
24.5K64K
FEP vs GSWO Performance
−3.8%+0.5%
- FEP 0.80%
- GSWO 0.15%, better
- FEP $484M
- GSWO $1.79B
- FEP +14.1%
- GSWO
- FEP 3.09%, better
- GSWO 1.46%
- FEP 209
- GSWO 751
- FEP 24.5K sh
- GSWO 64K sh, better
- FEP $56.56
- GSWO $64.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEP | GSWO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A98Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D34 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | B58Higher | F22 |
| Durability | B69Higher | B62 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. FEP and GSWO are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEPD
GSWOA
In short
FEP Most multifactor international funds sweep in the whole developed world. FEP sticks to Europe, ranking developed-European stocks on growth and value marks through First Trust's AlphaDEX screen rather than by market size.
GSWO Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) on developed markets outside the US, for 15 basis points. Goldman's ActiveBeta rules at a price closer to an index fund than an active one.
Stated mandate
FEP The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® EuropeTM Index, an equity index selecting and weighting developed-European securities through the AlphaDEX® methodology.
GSWO The fund is an ActiveBeta World Equity ETF designed to track an ActiveBeta Index and provide exposure to value, momentum, quality, and low-volatility characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEP vs GSWO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEP vs GSWO Cost
Overpaying FEP vs GSWO
$12,209
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEP 0.80%
$15,346
GSWO 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEP | GSWO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $274 | $1,148 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $1,071 | $4,322 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $3,137 | $12,209 |
- 0.80%FEP
- 0.15%GSWO, cheaper
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
GSWO cheapest of 30 funds
FEP 27th cheapest of 30 funds
FEP vs GSWO Dividends
- FEP 3.09%, better
- GSWO 1.46%
- FEP $1.74
- GSWO $0.93
- FEP $0.33
- GSWO $0.20
- FEP Sep 24, 2026
- GSWO Sep 24, 2026
- FEP Sep 30, 2026
- GSWO Sep 30, 2026
- FEP Quarterly
- GSWO Quarterly
Distribution history
FEP vs GSWO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEP 14.4%GSWO
- Return per unit of risk
- FEP 1.39GSWO
- Worst fall
- FEP −38.3%GSWO
- Market sensitivity
- FEP 0.90GSWO 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.