INTF ranks 1st and GSWO 3rd of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
GSWO vs INTF
GSWO −0.01pt a year
0.15%0.16%
INTF 4.8×the volume
64K309K
GSWO vs INTF Performance
+0.5%−1.8%
- GSWO 0.15%, better
- INTF 0.16%
- GSWO $1.79B
- INTF $3.7B
- GSWO
- INTF +17.0%
- GSWO 1.46%
- INTF 3.02%, better
- GSWO 751
- INTF 501
- GSWO 64K sh
- INTF 309K sh, better
- GSWO $64.95
- INTF $41.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSWO | INTF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98 | A98 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | A73 |
| Holdings | F22 | B68Higher |
| Durability | B62 | A86Higher |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. GSWO and INTF are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSWOA
INTFA
In short
GSWO Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) on developed markets outside the US, for 15 basis points. Goldman's ActiveBeta rules at a price closer to an index fund than an active one.
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
Stated mandate
GSWO The fund is an ActiveBeta World Equity ETF designed to track an ActiveBeta Index and provide exposure to value, momentum, quality, and low-volatility characteristics.
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSWO vs INTF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSWO vs INTF Cost
Overpaying INTF vs GSWO
$205
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSWO 0.15%
$3,137
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSWO | INTF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $292 | $18 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $1,141 | $70 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $3,342 | $205 |
- 0.15%GSWO, cheaper
- 0.16%INTF
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
GSWO cheapest of 30 funds
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
GSWO vs INTF Dividends
- GSWO 1.46%
- INTF 3.02%, better
- GSWO $0.93
- INTF $1.24
- GSWO $0.20
- INTF $0.72
- GSWO Sep 24, 2026
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- GSWO Sep 30, 2026
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- GSWO Quarterly
- INTF Twice a year
Distribution history
GSWO vs INTF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSWO INTF 11.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- GSWO INTF 1.45
- Worst fall
- GSWO INTF −27.6%
- Market sensitivity
- GSWO 0.75INTF 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.