GSWO ranks 3rd and RODM 5th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
GSWO vs RODM
GSWO −0.14pt a year
0.15%0.29%
RODM 1.4×the volume
64K88.7K
GSWO vs RODM Performance
+0.5%+0.9%
- GSWO 0.15%, better
- RODM 0.29%
- GSWO $1.79B
- RODM $1.68B
- GSWO
- RODM +21.6%
- GSWO 1.46%
- RODM 2.76%, better
- GSWO 751
- RODM 338
- GSWO 64K sh
- RODM 88.7K sh, better
- GSWO $64.95
- RODM $42.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSWO | RODM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | B67 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | A86Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | F22 | A72Higher |
| Durability | B62 | A70Higher |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. GSWO and RODM are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSWOA
RODMA
In short
GSWO Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) on developed markets outside the US, for 15 basis points. Goldman's ActiveBeta rules at a price closer to an index fund than an active one.
RODM Most international factor funds pick cheap, quality and momentum stocks and let the country weights land where they may. RODM's index does the factor work inside risk limits built to de-concentrate country, currency and single-company exposure.
Stated mandate
GSWO The fund is an ActiveBeta World Equity ETF designed to track an ActiveBeta Index and provide exposure to value, momentum, quality, and low-volatility characteristics.
RODM Seeks, before fees and expenses, to track the total return of the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, which covers companies in major developed markets outside the United States.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSWO vs RODM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSWO vs RODM Cost
Overpaying RODM vs GSWO
$2,815
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSWO 0.15%
$3,137
RODM 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSWO | RODM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $527 | $253 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $2,044 | $973 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $5,952 | $2,815 |
- 0.15%GSWO, cheaper
- 0.29%RODM
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
GSWO cheapest of 30 funds
RODM 11th cheapest of 30 funds
GSWO vs RODM Dividends
- GSWO 1.46%
- RODM 2.76%, better
- GSWO $0.93
- RODM $1.16
- GSWO $0.20
- RODM $0.64
- GSWO Sep 24, 2026
- RODM Jun 25, 2026
- GSWO Sep 30, 2026
- RODM Jun 29, 2026
- GSWO Quarterly
- RODM Twice a year
Distribution history
GSWO vs RODM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSWO RODM 10.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- GSWO RODM 1.71
- Worst fall
- GSWO RODM −27.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GSWO 0.75RODM 0.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.